Skip to main content
. 2021 Aug 10;2021:5577163. doi: 10.1155/2021/5577163

Table 1.

Effect Z. jujuba extract on the latency to reach the platform during the acquisition phase in the Morris water maze.

Treatment Day 1 lat. (s) Day 2 lat. (s) Day 3 lat. (s) Day 4 lat. (s)
DW + DW 21.3 ± 4.4 8.3 ± 0.8 6.9 ± 0.5 5.9 ± 0.2
SCO + DW 29.3 ± 3.5 15.0 ± 2.0 14.1 ± 2.2 14.5 ± 2.7c
SCO + DZ 24.7 ± 2.2 13.3 ± 2.6 12.8 ± 2.5 6.1 ± 1.1∗∗
SCO + TA 51.7 ± 4.3 10.6 ± 1.8 9.8 ± 1.5 10.9 ± 1.4
SCO + E29 38.8 ± 2.1 9.8 ± 0.9 6.2 ± 0.8 5.2 ± 0.4∗∗∗
SCO + E57 36.9 ± 6.7 6.9 ± 0.7 8.8 ± 0.9 7.2 ± 0.7∗∗
SCO + E114 27.2 ± 3.4 6.7 ± 1.5 7.4 ± 0.6 6.0 ± 0.7∗∗∗

Each value represents the average ± SEM; n = 7. cp < 0.001vs. normal control. ∗∗p < 0.01; ∗∗∗p < 0.001vs. negative control. s: second; lat.: latency time; DW: distilled water (10 ml/kg); SCO: scopolamine (1 mg/kg); DZ: donepezil (1.2 mg/kg); TA: tacrine (10 mg/kg); E29, E57, and E114: aqueous extracts of Z. jujuba at respective doses of 29, 57, and 114 mg/kg. DW + DW: normal control group; SCO + DW: negative control group; SCO + DZ: positive control group with donepezil; SCO + TA: positive control group treated with tacrine; SCO + E29-E114: test groups treated with Z. jujuba extract.