Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Fam Community Health. 2021 Oct-Dec;44(4):257–265. doi: 10.1097/FCH.0000000000000306

Table 1.

Mean percent of public school students with access to Internet-enabled technology and broadband, by rurality. Washington State, 2020.

Urban Rural All districts Sig.*
Mean (95% CI) Mean (95% CI) Mean (95% CI)
Internet-enabled technology at home
  Desktop or laptop computer 76.0 (65.3–86.7) 66.0 (58.0–73.9) 73.9 (65.2–82.6) 0.14
  Tablet or smartphone 59.2 (45.8–72.6) 58.3 (49.7–66.8) 59.0 (48.3–69.7) 0.91
  Device that is “adequate for online learning” 90.1 (86.9–93.3) 80.0 (75.1–84.9) 88.0 (84.9–91.1) <0.01
Reliable broadband Internet adequate to support synchronous (real-time) video 84.2 (79.6–88.8) 67.5 (61.4–73.5) 80.7 (76.4–85.0) <0.01

Source: Author

Note: Values indicate the estimated mean (weighted) percent of students reported by school district. Sample weights based on district average daily attendance have been applied. Rurality based on school district classification of rurality NCES scheme. Item response rates varied as follows: Access to desktop/laptop computer, n=147 rural and n=84 urban districts; access to a tablet or smartphone, n=135 rural and n=72 urban districts; access to a device adequate for online learning, n=137 rural and n=65 urban; broadband, n=136 rural and n=65 urban.

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; NCES, National Center for Educational Statistics; SD, standard deviation

*

Wald test comparing responses from urban and rural districts.