Emery-Dreifuss muscular dystrophy (EDMD) is a rare and often slowly progressive genetic disorder that primarily affects skeletal muscles and cardiac muscle. Contractures along with joint deformities are also considered early features of the disease.1 Currently, nine types of EDMD are recognized. The SYNE2 gene, located on chromosome 14q23 codes for a nuclear envelope protein; heterogenous mutation in this gene leads to EDMD type 5 (EDMD5), an adult-onset, autosomal dominant muscular dystrophy.2 However, the disease phenotype is incompletely defined. We report a case of EDMD5 presenting with bilateral ptosis and mild muscular weakness.
A 38-year-old right-handed woman presented with a chief complaint of ptosis. She reported slowly progressive painless and non-fluctuating bilateral eyelid ptosis. On further questioning, she recently also started having difficulty in swallowing. She had no dysarthria, dysphonia, dyspnea or arm weakness, but did feel that her legs were weak at the end of the day. Careful review of prior external photographs confirmed gradual worsening of the ptosis since her twenties (Figure). The patient had no significant past medical history. She had immigrated to the United States from mainland Portugal. There was no family history of ocular, neurologic, or neuromuscular disease.
Figure.
1992, B-2005, C-2016, D-A year prior to presentation
The clinical examination showed asymmetric bilateral ptosis (left>right), Upper margin to light reflexes were 2mm on the right and 0mm on the left, with total upper lid excursion of 13.5mm right and 12mm left. She had intact eye movements, and no ocular misalignment. There was mild orbicularis oculi weakness and mild neck flexion and extension weakness. In the extremities, there was mild weakness of biceps, triceps, deltoid, infraspinatus and hip abductor muscles but distal muscle groups had full strength. Muscle stretch reflexes were present but hypoactive. Sensory examination was normal.
Serologic evaluation, including a myasthenia gravis antibody panel with MuSK and LRP4 antibodies, was significant only for increased CK levels (752 units/liter). EMG was normal, including single fiber EMG without abnormal jitter. A muscular dystrophy genetic panel (Medical Neurogenetics, LLC, Atlanta, GA, USA) revealed a heterozygous variant in SYNE2 (Chr14:64676190, c.18434A>G, p.Tyr6145Cys, rs755990889, Allele frequency: G=0.000008) (Table). The affected nucleotide is highly conserved across vertebrate species. The resulting missense mutation localizes to the most conserved spectrin repeat domain within nespin-2 (52), which mediates homodimerization and other protein-protein interactions.3 Integrating these data, this variant is likely pathogenic (3 moderate criteria and 2 supporting criteria).4 There was a heterozygous mutation in NEB (Chr2:152424912, c.17654G>A, p.Trp5885Ter), which has been implicated in autosomal recessive nemaline myopathy type 2 and causes a very different phenotype; this variant was deemed not significant and unlikely to compound the SYNE2 variant.
Table.
Multimodal in silico analysis of SYNE2 missense variant.
| Method | Score | Range | Prediction5 | Basis4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GERP-RS (NE) | 4.22 (5.35) | −12.36 – 6.18 (Evolutionary constraint) |
Constrained | Nucleotide conservation prediction |
| MutationTaster | 194 | 0 – 215 (Benign – Disease causing) |
Disease causing | Protein structure/function and evolutionary conservation |
| MutPred2 | 0.44 | 0.00−1.00 (Probability of pathogenicity) |
Pathogenic | Protein structure/function and evolutionary conservation |
| SIFT | <0.01 | 0.00 – 1.00 (Deleterious – Tolerated) |
Deleterious | Evolutionary conservation |
| PolyPhen-2 | 0.30 | 0.00 – 1.00 (Benign – Probably Damaging) |
Benign | Protein structure/function and evolutionary conservation |
| PROVEAN | −8.44 | −13 – 4 (Deleterious – Neutral) | Deleterious | Alignment and measurement of similarity between variant sequence and protein sequence homolog |
| Condel* | 0.54 | 0.00 – 1.00 (Neutral – Deleterious) |
Deleterious | Combines SIFT, PolyPhen-2 and MutationAssessor |
| CADD (scaled)* | 24.4 | 1 – 99 (Rank) | Deleterious | Contrasts annotations of fixed/nearly fixed derived alleles in humans with simulated variants |
Integrate multiple methods
Muscular dystrophies may present to the neuro-ophthalmologist when they cause ptosis and/or paretic strabismus. A myogenic etiology should be suspected in case of a non-fluctuating progressive worsening of ptosis over years that can be confirmed by review of prior pictures. Detailed neurological exam which may demonstrate specific patterns of muscular weakness, even when this is not the presenting problem. In the context of an abnormal CK, a likely pathogenic variant and a consistent clinical phenotype, muscle biopsy was not recommended.
Diagnosis of a specific muscular dystrophy can be challenging in the setting of many disease-causing variants in multiple genes and wide clinical variability, thus next generation sequencing of expanding genetic panels are an increasingly important diagnostic resource for the clinician. Careful review of ambiguous results, often in collaboration with the testing company and/or a geneticist, is critical for accurate interpretation and attribution of disease manifestations to a genetic cause.
Acknowledgments
Funding information: EDG: NIH K08 EY030164
Footnotes
Disclosure of Conflicts of Interest: None of the authors has any conflict of interest to disclose.
Ethical Publication Statement: We confirm that we have read the Journal’s position on issues involved in ethical publication and affirm that this report is consistent with those guidelines.
References
- 1.Merlini L & Maraldi NM Emery-dreifuss muscular dystrophy. in Neuromuscular Disorders in Clinical Practice (2014). doi: 10.1007/978-1-4614-6567-6_61 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Zhang Q et al. Nesprin-1 and −2 are involved in the pathogenesis of Emery–Dreifuss muscular dystrophy and are critical for nuclear envelope integrity. Hum. Mol. Genet 16, 2816–2833 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Autore F et al. Large-Scale Modelling of the Divergent Spectrin Repeats in Nesprins: Giant Modular Proteins. PLoS One (2013). doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0063633 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Richards S et al. Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: A joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Genet. Med (2015). doi: 10.1038/gim.2015.30 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Dong C et al. Comparison and integration of deleteriousness prediction methods for nonsynonymous SNVs in whole exome sequencing studies. Hum. Mol. Genet (2015). doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddu733 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

