Skip to main content
. 2021 Aug 5;12:686514. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.686514

Table 1.

Characteristics of the included studies.

Study Study design Mean age (years) Age at menarche Menstrual bleeding duration (days) Study group case/total Control group case/total RR (95% CI) or SMD (95% CI) Assessment of dysmenorrhea or pain severity Assessment of depression
The 6 included studies that provided the sufficient data which could be calculated for the pooled RR via a meta-analysis:
Coleman (15) 2006 Gambia Cross-sectional 15-54 NA NA 14/33 38/210 2.34 (1.44, 3.83) NA The Edinburgh Depression Scale
László (14) 2009 Hungary Case–control S: 37.2 ± 9.4C: 38.5 ± 9.3 NA NA 11/165 33/656 1.33 (0.68, 2.57) Specific question BDI
Gagua (16)2013 Georgia Case–control S: 16.0 ± 1.4C: 15.5 ± 0.9 S: 12.6 ± 1.0 C: 12.7 ± 1.0 S: 4.9 ± 1.4C: 4.5 ± 1.2 49/276 9/148 2.92 (1.48, 5.78) The VAS and MPQ BDI
Faramarzi (17) 2014 Iran Cross-sectional Both S & C:20.4 ± 1.6 66.4% more than 12 years Both S & C:6.4 ± 1.1 81/180 43/180 1.88 (1.39, 2.56) A verbal multidimensional scoring system The DAS-21
Uçar (18) 2018 Turkey Case–control Both S & C:20.9 ± 1.7 Both S & C: 13.5 ± 1.2 76.6% lessthan 6 days 127/471 81/471 1.57 (1.22, 2.01) Numeric PainRating Scale BDI
Meng (19) 2019 China Case–control 29.04 ± 4.29 NA NA Calculated by the RR#: 50/192 Calculated by the RR#: 22/168 Original data from the study: 1.95 (1.24, 3.06) Specific question The Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale
The 2 included studies that provided the BDI scoring which were calculated for the pooled SMD via a meta-analysis:
Balik (20) 2014 Turkey Case– control S: 17.7 ± 1.3C: 17.8 ± 1.1 S: 13.2 ±1.2 C: 13.4 ± 1.1 NA NA/108 (11.9 ± 10.8) NA/159(7.1 ± 7.6) 0.53 (0.28, 0.78) The Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale BDI
Bahrami (21) 2017 Iran Cross- sectional S: 14.6 ± 1.5C: 14.6 ± 1.7 S: 12.4 ± 1.1 C: 12.6 ± 1.1 80%: 4-7 days NA/322 (12.0 ± 10.0) NA/148(8.0 ± 7.8) 0.43 (0.23, 0.62) Specific scale BDI
The 2 included studies that provided the PROMIS T-Score which were calculated for the pooled SMD via a meta-analysis:
Hellman (22) 2018 USA Cross- sectional S: 24 ± 6C: 24 ± 7 NA NA NA/98 (53 ± 1) NA/35(55 ± 1) −2.0 (-2.46,−1.54) Numerical rating scale PROMIS
Zuckerman (23) 2018 USA Cross- sectional S: 34.1 ± 7.6C: 35.2 ± 7.1 NA S: 5.3 ± 1.5C: 4.8 ± 1.5 NA/285 (53.6 ± 9.2) NA/386(50.9 ± 8.8) 0.3 (0.15, 0.45) Scale of noncyclic pelvic pain PROMIS

BDI, Beck Depression Inventory; VAS, The Visual Analogue Scale; MPQ, McGill Pain Questionnaire; DAS-21, Depression Anxiety and Stress Scale; PROMIS, The NIH Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System; RR, Relative Risk; SMD, standard mean differences; CI, Confidence Interval; S: Study group, women with dysmenorrhea; C: Control group, women without dysmenorrhea; NA, Not Available; #: Estimated using the methods described in the Cochrane Handbook.