Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Aug 19.
Published in final edited form as: Inclusion (Wash). 2020;8(4):335–350.

Table 2.

Measurement Invariance Models

Model χ2 df CFI TLI RMSEA SRMR Model Comparison Δχ2 ΔCFI ΔRMSEA
Cohort 1: 806
Cohort 2: 807
Cohort 3: 805
A1 Configural invariance 137.592* 72 .989 .984 .034 .030
A2 Metric invariance 159.673* 84 .988 .984 .033 .033 A2 - A1 24.043* −.001 −.001
A3 Scalar invariance 237.772* 122 .981 .984 .034 .035 A3 - A2 79.940* −.007 .001
A3–1 Partial scalar invariance 220.704* 118 .984 .985 .033 .034 A3–1 - A2 62.205* −.004 .000

Note. CFI=Comparative Fit Index; TLI=Tucker Lewis Index; RMSEA=Root Mean Square Error of Approximation; SRMR=Standardized Root Mean Square Residual.

*

p < .05.