Table 2.

Associations between maximum VO₂^a and domain-specific cognitive performance^b are presented in panel A while association between maximum VO₂ and structural magnetic resonance imaging derived brain volumes are presented in panel B (N = 33).

Panel A: Associations between max VO2 and domain-specific cognitive performance		95% Confidence Interval
	Estfc	Lower	Upper	B-H p d
Executive functiond	.324	.064	.585	.025
Episodic memorye	.391	.129	.653	.008
Visuospatialf	.570	.238	.901	.005
Attentiong	.081	−.241	.403	.623
Languageh	.243	−.164	.651	.302
Panel B: Associations between max VO2 and structural magnetic resonance imaging derived brain volumese		95% Confidence Interval
	Estc	lower	upper	B-H p d
Thalamus	.722	.430	1.015	.004
Pallidum	.635	.354	.916	.004
Caudate nucleus	.155	−.260	.571	.464
Putamen	−.248	−.585	.088	.395
Dorsolateral prefrontal cortex	.095	−.326	.516	.813
Nucleus accumbens	.119	−.242	.479	.813
Anterior cingulate	−.113	−.409	.183	.813
Hippocampus	−.081	−.511	.348	.813
Cerebellum	.024	−.245	.294	.859

Bolded estimates denote p < .05

^amaximum VO₂ was estimated by the Ebbling Single State Submaximal Treadmill Walking Test and z-score standardized (mean = 0; standard deviation=1) based on the sample mean and standard deviation.

^ball cognitive outcomes were z-score standardized (mean = 0; standard deviation =1).

^cparameter estimates were adjusted for covariates.

^dp value represents the Benjamini-Hochberg adjusted p value to correct for multiple comparisons.

^ebrain volumes were derived from structural magnetic resonance imaging, were corrected for intracranial volume and were z-score standardized using the sample mean and standard deviation.