Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Aug 19.
Published in final edited form as: Eur Respir J. 2020 Jul 7;56(1):2000535. doi: 10.1183/13993003.00535-2020

Table 1.

Interpretation of Strong and Conditional (Weak) Recommendations

Recommendations
Strong Conditional
Patients • Most individuals in this situation would want the recommended course of action, and only a small proportion would not. • The majority of individuals in this situation would want the suggested course of action, but many would not.
Clinicians • Most individuals should receive the intervention.
• Adherence to the recommendation according to the guideline could be used as a quality criterion or performance indicator.
• Formal decision aids are not likely to be needed to help individuals make decisions consistent with their values and preferences.
• Recognize that different choices will be appropriate for individual patients and that you must help each patient arrive at a management decision consistent with his or her values and preferences. Decision aids may be useful in helping individuals to make decisions consistent with their values and preferences.
Policymakers • The recommendation can be adopted as policy in most situations. • Policymaking will require substantial debate and involvement of various stakeholders.

Source: Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation Working Group [1, 2]