Table 2.

Logistic Multilevel Models Predicting Specific Negative Consequences Using Each Intoxication Scale

Outcome	Scale	Odds Ratio [95 % CI]	Pseudo-R2	AIC	BIC
Hangover	Standard	1.90 [1.33, 2.69]**	.10	270.4	283.7
	Four-anchored	1.56 [1.28, 1.91]**	.16	269.8	283.2
Became aggressive	Standard	1.76 [1.46, 2.12]**	.27	323.3	336.6
	Four-anchored	1.73 [1.45, 2.05]**	.33	310.7	324.1
Felt nauseated	Standard	.95 [.87, 1.03]	.00	743.8	757.2
	Four-anchored	.96 [.89, 1.04]	.00	742.4	755.8
Hurt or injured self	Standard	2.12 [1.71, 2.63]**	.32	357.0	370.4
	Four-anchored	2.20 [1.77, 2.73]**	.44	336.1	349.5
Blacked out	Standard	1.66 [1.48, 1.85]**	.25	675.7	689.0
	Four-anchored	1.54 [1.40, 1.69]**	.23	676.4	689.7
Embarrassed self	Standard	1.27 [1.15, 1.40]**	.06	707.9	721.2
	Four-anchored	1.23 [1.13, 1.34]**	.06	704.3	717.6
Was rude or obnoxious	Standard	1.62 [1.07, 2.43]*	.04	124.3	137.7
	Four-anchored	1.53 [1.09, 2.14]*	.05	123.2	136.5

Note. N = 631–637 days nested within 145–148 individuals. Pseudo-R² indicates the proportion of variance in the outcome variable accounted for by the single fixed effect (Nakagawa et al., 2013, 2017). AIC = Akaike Information Criterion; BIC = Bayesian Information Criterion.

^*p < .05

^**p < .001.