Skip to main content
. 2021 Aug 17;11(8):e048114. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048114

Table 2.

Association of changes in oral condition and behaviour with number of missing teeth over time



Risk factor change
Time-varying number of missing teeth
Base model* Adjusted model†
Beta (95% CI) RR (95% CI) P value Beta (95% CI) RR (95% CI) P value
Mean CAL (per 1 mm) 0.10 (0.08 to 0.13) 1.11 (1.09 to 1.14) <0.001 0.05 (0.03 to 0.07) 1.05 (1.03 to 1.07) <0.001
Dental plaque index (per 1 point) 0.11 (0.07 to 0.13) 1.11 (1.08 to 1.14) <0.001 −0.01 (−0.04 to 0.02) 0.99 (0.97 to 1.02) 0.640
Number of decayed and filled teeth (per 1 teeth) −0.05 (−0.06 to −0.05) 0.95 (0.94 to 0.95) <0.001 0.04 (0.03 to 0.05) 1.04 (1.03 to 1.04) <0.001
Toothbrushing ≤1 time (yes) 0.03 (−0.02 to 0.08) 1.03 (0.98 to 1.09) 0.256 −0.02 (−0.06 to 0.02) 0.98 (0.94 to 1.03) 0.424
No regular dental visit (yes) −0.01 (−0.04 to 0.04) 0.99 (0.96 to 1.04) 0.983 −0.01 (−0.04 to 0.03) 0.99 (0.96 to 1.04) 0.926

Poisson mixed models; time-varying number of missing teeth was the dependent variable and changes in oral condition and behaviour were the independent variable. Rate ratios in number of missing teeth for a one-unit change in the independent variable was calculated using the formula exp (beta), where beta was the parameter estimate for the independent variable from Poisson mixed model.

*Base model; Poisson mixed model adjusted for age and sex.

†Adjusted model included all independent variables (time-varying variables), age, sex, number of present teeth and job at baseline.

CAL, clinical attachment level; RR, rate ratio.