Table 2.

Newcastle-Ottawa quality assessment of observational studies.

First author, year	Study design	Selection	Comparability	Outcome	Total score	Result
Atkins JL et al. (Atkins et al., 2020) 2020	Cohort	***	**	***	8	Good
De Smet R et al. (De Smet et al., 2020) 2020	Cohort	***	**	***	8	Good
Garcez FB et al. (Garcez et al., 2020) 2020	Cohort	***	**	****	9	Good
Hammes J et al. (Hammes et al., 2020) 2020	Cohort	***	**	**	7	Good
Helms J et al. (Helms et al., 2020) 2020	Cohort	***	**	***	8	Good
Karlsson LK et al. (Karlsson et al., 2020) 2020	Cohort	***	**	***	8	Good
Kennedy M et al. (Kennedy et al., 2020) 2020	Cohort	***	**	***	8	Good
Khan SH et al. (Khan et al., 2020) 2020	Cohort	***	**	****	9	Good
Knopp P et al. (Knopp et al., 2020) 2020	Cohort	***	**	***	8	Good
Marengoni A et al. (Marengoni et al., 2020) 2020	Cohort	***	**	***	8	Good
Mattace-Raso F et al. (Mattace-Raso et al., 2020) 2020	Cohort	**	**	***	7	Good
Poloni TE et al. (Poloni et al., 2020) 2020	Cohort	****	**	***	9	Good
Rawle MJ et al. (Rawle et al., 2020) 2020	Cohort	***	**	***	8	Good
Rebora P et al. (Rebora et al., 2020) 2020	Cohort	***	**	***	8	Good
Romero-Sanchez CM et al. (Romero-Sánchez et al., 2020) 2020	Cohort	***	**	***	8	Good
Steinmeyer Z et al. (Steinmeyer et al., 2020) 2020	Cohort	***	**	***	8	Good
Ticinesi A et al. (Ticinesi et al., 2020) 2020	Cohort	***	**	***	8	Good
Vrillon A et al. (Vrillon et al., 2020) 2020	Cohort	***	**	***	8	Good
Zerah L et al. (Zerah et al., 2020) 2020	Cohort	***	**	****	9	Good