Table 3.
Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal tool for case series.
| Emmerton D et al. (Emmerton and Abdelhafiz, 2020) 2020 | |
|---|---|
| 1. Were the criteria for inclusion in the sample clearly defined? | No |
| 2. Were the study subjects and the setting described in detail? | Yes |
| 3. Was the exposure measured in a valid and reliable way? | Yes |
| 4. Were objective, standard criteria used for measurement of the condition? | Yes |
| 5. Were confounding factors identified? | Yes |
| 6. Were strategies to deal with confounding factors stated? | No |
| 7. Were the outcomes measured in a valid and reliable way? | Yes |
| 8. Was appropriate statistical analysis used? | Yes |
| Quality | Include study |