TABLE 1.
Hypothesis | Prediction for adolescent males |
Support? |
---|---|---|
H1: Sexual coercion hypothesis | 1a: More aggression toward cycling than non-cycling females | No |
1b: More copulations with females targeted most frequently with aggression by male | Weak | |
H2: Social dominance hypothesis | 2a: Less aggression directed toward females after dominating them | No |
2b: Dominate all females before dominating any adult male | Yes | |
2c: Majority of aggression toward adult females, rather than adult males, prior to adulthood | Yes | |
H3: Dominance-contingent coercion hypothesis | 3a: Female cycling status predicts male aggression more strongly after dominance | No |
3b: Male aggression predicts copulations more strongly after dominance | No | |
H4: Female-rank-based aggression hypothesis (complements other hypotheses) | 4a: Initiate aggression against low- before high-ranking females | Yes |
4b: Dominate low- before high-ranking females | Yes |