Table 1.
Summary of the seasonal trends in the rate and microbiological profiles of infectious keratitis in the literature, in the order of chronology.
Year | Authors | Study period | Sample sizea | Location | Overall seasonal rate | Microbiological profilesb |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2008 | Green et al. [10] | 1999–2004 | 253 | Brisbane, Australia | Not examined |
P. aeruginosa (in summer); S. pneumonia (in winter) |
2009 | Ibrahim et al. [11] | 1997–2003 | 1786 | Portsmouth, UK | Summer > winter > autumn > spring | Not examined |
2012 | Lin et al. [12] | 2006–2009 | 6967 | Southeast India | Summer > winter > spring/autumn |
Fungi (in summer); P. aeruginosa (in July–December) |
2013 | Otri et al. [13] | 2007–2010 | 129 | Nottingham, UK | Summer > spring > winter > autumn | Not examined |
2015 | Ni et al. [14] | 2009–2012 | 313 | Philadelphia, US | Spring > autumn > summer > winter | Bacteria (in spring) |
2016 | Gorski et al. [15] | 2008–2013 | 155 | New York, US | Summer > winter > spring > autumn | P. aeruginosa (in summer) |
2018c | Walkden et al. [16] | 2004–2015 | 4229 | Manchester, UK | Winter > autumn > spring > summer |
P. aeruginosa (in summer); CoNS (in autumn); Candida (in summer) |
2020 |
Ting et al. (current study) |
2008–2019 | 1272 | Nottingham, UK | Summer > autumn > winter > spring |
P. aeruginosa (in summer); Gram-positive bacilli (in summer) |
aNumber of cases of infectious keratitis.
bCausative microorganisms that demonstrated significant seasonal predilection.
cThe reported seasonal rate refers to the culture positivity rate of infectious keratitis but not the overall rate of infectious keratitis.