Skip to main content
. 2021 Aug 19;11:16919. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-96475-5

Table 6.

Comparison of the studied model performance using the confusion matrix table.

Darknet Normal Trophozoite Schizont Gametocyte
(1) Darknet model
Normal 594 (97.38%) 4 (0.83%) 0 (0.00%) 0 (0.00%)
Trophozoite 16 (2.62%) 480 (99.17%) 0 (0.00%) 0 (0.00%)
Schizont 0 (0.00%) 0 (0.00%) 60 (100.00%) 0 (0.00%)
Gametocyte 0 (0.00%) 0 (0.00%) 0 (0.00%) 5 (100.00%)
Darknet19 Normal Trophozoite Schizont Gametocyte
(2) Darknet19 model
Normal 593 (97.21%) 5 (1.03%) 0 (0.00%) 0 (0.00%)
Trophozoite 17 (2.79%) 479 (98.97%) 0 (0.00%) 0 (0.00%)
Schizont 0 (0.00%) 0 (0.00%) 60 (100.00%) 0 (0.00%)
Gametocyte 0 (0.00%) 0 (0.00%) 0 (0.00%) 5 (100.00%)
Darknet19-448 Normal Trophozoite Schizont Gametocyte
(3) Darknet19-448 model
Normal 593 (91.21%) 21 (4.34%) 0 (0.00%) 0 (0.00%)
Trophozoite 17 (2.79%) 463 (95.66%) 0 (0.00%) 0 (0.00%)
Schizont 0 (0.00%) 0 (0.00%) 60 (100.00%) 0 (0.00%)
Gametocyte 0 (0.00%) 0 (0.00%) 0 (0.00%) 5 (100.00%)
Densenet201 Normal Trophozoite Schizont Gametocyte
(4) Densenet201 model
Normal 589 (96.56%) 22 (4.55%) 0 (0.00%) 0 (0.00%)
Trophozoite 21 (3.44%) 455 (94.01%) 0 (0.00%) 0 (0.00%)
Schizont 0 (0.00%) 7 (1.45%) 60 (100.00%) 0 (0.00%)
Gametocyte 0 (0.00%) 0 (0.00%) 0 (0.00%) 5 (100.00%)