Skip to main content
. 2021 Aug 8;12(3):506–513. doi: 10.1016/j.jaim.2021.05.005

Table 2.

Effect of EmbliQur and metformin on HOMA-IR and QUICKI in HFD/STZ-treated rats.

Day of study Index type Normal Control HFD + STZ EmbliQur 500 EmbliQur 1000 Metformin
Day 18 of the study and 1st day of drug treatment HOMA-IR 3.78 ± 0.32 34.16 ± 5.17$ 33.75 ± 4.06 37.86 ± 6.60 31.70 ± 4.75
QUICKI 0.31 ± 0.01 0.24 ± 0.01$ 0.24 ± 0.01 0.24 ± 0.01 0.24 ± 0.01
Day 25 of study and 8th day of drug treatment HOMA-IR 3.50 ± 0.28 31.33 ± 5.62$ 12.18 ± 1.20∗∗∗ 17.70 ± 2.05∗ 9.91 ± 0.69∗∗∗
QUICKI 0.31 ± 0.0034 0.24 ± 0.0054$ 0.27 ± 0.0033∗∗∗ 0.26 ± 0.0036∗∗∗ 0.276 ± 0.0021∗∗∗
Day 32 of study and 15thday of drug treatment HOMA-IR 4.41 ± 0.41 35.36 ± 5.08$ 22.66 ± 4.90 19.43 ± 2.46∗ 15.80 ± 2.76∗∗
QUICKI 0.31 ± 0.0036 0.24 ± 0.0049$ 0.25 ± 0.0055 0.25 ± 0.0033 0.26 ± 0.0042∗∗
Day 39 of the study and 22nd day of drug treatment HOMA-IR 3.78 ± 0.17 32.18 ± 8.49$ 12.76 ± 0.45∗ 6.81 ± 1.12∗∗∗ 10.56 ± 1.70∗∗
QUICKI 0.31 ± 0.01 0.24 ± 0.01$ 0.27 ± 0.00∗∗ 0.29 ± 0.01∗∗∗ 0.27 ± 0.01∗∗∗
Day 46 of the study and last day of drug treatment HOMA-IR 4.63 ± 0.25 38.76 ± 2.20$ 6.23 ± 0.60∗∗∗ 5.23 ± 0.38∗∗∗ 5.81 ± 0.39∗∗∗
QUICKI 0.30 ± 0.01 0.238 ± 0.01$ 0.29 ± 0.01∗∗∗ 0.30 ± 0.01∗∗∗ 0.29 ± 0.01∗∗∗

All values are expressed as mean ± SEM; N = 6 in each group; One way ANOVA followed by Tukey–Kramer multiple comparison test is applied for statistical analysis; $p < 0.001when HFD/STZ group compared with Normal Control and ∗∗p < 0.01 and ∗∗∗p < 0.001 when experimental groups compared with HFD/STZ group.