Table 2.
Comparisons between CAR-T cells and CAR-NK cells.
| CAR-T cells | CAR-NK cells | |
|---|---|---|
| Sources | mostly autologous T cells; using allogenic T cells may cause GVHD | various sources: PBMCs, UCB, NK cell line, iPSCs, hESCs, HPCs | 
| Transduction efficiency | higher | lower | 
| In-vivo persistence | better | worse | 
| Safety | using allogeneic T cells may cause GVHD; | rarely cause GVHD, may even protect against GVHD; | 
| CRS and neurotoxicity are two acute side effects observed in CAR-T cell immunotherapy | no CRS and neurotoxicity observed in CAR-NK cell immunotherapy | |
| Efficacy | high: recognize tumor cells through the CAR-dependent manner | higher: recognize tumor cells through both CAR-dependent | 
| and CAR-independent manners | ||
| Convenience | less convenience: necessities of matching HLA; | more convenience: the possibilities to be an off-to-shelf | 
| the consuming manufacturing time and expensive price | products because of no HLA-restriction and various sources | |
| Current status | two CD19 CAR-T cells have been approved by the FDA; | preclinical and clinical trials have been conducted; | 
| new types of CAR-T cells have been conducted in clinical trial | several published data are available now |