. 2021 Aug 17;8:100372. doi: 10.1016/j.ejro.2021.100372

Table 2.

Outcomes of included studies.

Author, year	MRI sensitivity	MRI Specificity	MRI PPV	MRI NPV	Lymph node size cut off value
Laukka et al. 2020. [14]	98 % (88.5 %–99 %).	100 %	100 %	80 %	7 mm in short axis
Sohaib et al. 2009. [15]	Experienced radiologist: 96 % (86−100%)	Experienced radiologist: 100 %	Experienced radiologist: 100 %	Experienced radiologist: 91.6 %	10 mm in short axis
	Experienced radiologist: 96 % (86−100%)			Non-experienced radiologist: 65 %
	Non-experienced radiologist: 78 % (65−87%)
			Non-experienced radiologist: 95 %
		Non-experienced radiologist: 91 %	Non-experienced radiologist: 95 %
Ellis et al. 1984. [16]	MRI: 80 %	Not mentioned	Not mentioned	Not mentioned	10 mm in short axis
Ellis et al. 1984. [16]	CT: 84 %	Not mentioned	Not mentioned	Not mentioned	10 mm in short axis

CT: Computed tomography; MRI: Magnetic resonance imaging; DWI: Diffusion-weighted imaging.