This survey study examines the frequency, types, and sources of perceived workplace mistreatment and the prevalence of suicidal ideation among emergency medicine residents in the US.
Key Points
Question
What is the prevalence of workplace mistreatment and suicidal thoughts among emergency medicine residents?
Findings
In this survey study of 7680 emergency medicine residents, 45.1% reported exposure to some type of workplace mistreatment (eg, discrimination, abuse, or harassment) and 2.5% reported having suicidal thoughts during the most recent academic year. The prevalence of workplace mistreatment and suicidal thoughts was similar by gender and race/ethnicity.
Meaning
The findings suggest that educational interventions are warranted to reduce workplace mistreatment and ensure emergency medicine residents’ well-being during training.
Abstract
Importance
The prevalence of workplace mistreatment and its association with the well-being of emergency medicine (EM) residents is unclear. More information about the sources of mistreatment might encourage residency leadership to develop and implement more effective strategies to improve professional well-being not only during residency but also throughout the physician’s career.
Objective
To examine the prevalence, types, and sources of perceived workplace mistreatment during training among EM residents in the US and the association between mistreatment and suicidal ideation.
Design, Setting, and Participants
In this survey study conducted from February 25 to 29, 2020, all residents enrolled in EM residencies accredited by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) who participated in the 2020 American Board of Emergency Medicine computer-based In-training Examination were invited to participate. A multiple-choice, 35-item survey was administered after the examination asking residents to self-report the frequency, sources, and types of mistreatment experienced during residency training and whether they had suicidal thoughts.
Main Outcomes and Measures
The types and frequency of workplace mistreatment and the sources of the mistreatment were identified, and rates of self-reported suicidality were obtained. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to examine resident and program characteristics associated with suicidal thoughts.
Results
Of 8162 eligible EM residents, 7680 (94.1%) responded to at least 1 question on the survey; 6503 (79.7%) completed the survey in its entirety. A total of 243 ACGME-accredited residency programs participated, and 1 did not. The study cohort included 4768 male residents (62.1%), 2698 female residents (35.1%), 4919 non-Hispanic White residents (64.0%), 2620 residents from other racial/ethnic groups (Alaska Native, American Indian, Asian or Pacific Islander, African American, Mexican American, Native Hawaiian, Puerto Rican, other Hispanic, or mixed or other race) (34.1%), 483 residents who identified as lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, or other (LGBTQ+) (6.3%), and 5951 residents who were married or in a relationship (77.5%). Of the total participants, 3463 (45.1%) reported exposure to some type of workplace mistreatment (eg, discrimination, abuse, or harassment) during the most recent academic year. A frequent source of mistreatment was identified as patients and/or patients’ families; 1234 respondents (58.7%) reported gender discrimination, 867 (67.5%) racial discrimination, 282 (85.2%) physical abuse, and 723 (69.1%) sexual harassment from patients and/or family members. Suicidal thoughts occurring during the past year were reported by 178 residents (2.5%), with similar prevalence by gender (108 men [2.4%]; 59 women [2.4%]) and race/ethnicity (113 non-Hispanic White residents [2.4%]; 65 residents from other racial/ethnic groups [2.7%]).
Conclusions and Relevance
In this survey study, EM residents reported that workplace mistreatment occurred frequently. The findings suggest common sources of mistreatment for which educational interventions may be developed to help ensure resident wellness and career satisfaction.
Introduction
Workplace mistreatment (eg, discrimination, harassment, abuse, and assault) and its institutional responses are associated with hostile work environments for physicians.1,2,3,4 The prevalence of workplace mistreatment has previously been shown to vary by gender and race/ethnicity, with the highest rates among women and racial/ethnic minority populations.5,6 Prior research has suggested that workplace mistreatment increases feelings of marginalization and may threaten a person’s sense of self, resulting in decreased job performance and productivity as well as increased stress, job dissatisfaction, negative workplace behaviors, and turnover.5,7,8 Workplace discrimination is associated with adverse physical and mental health, including increased rates of anxiety, depression, and cardiovascular disease.7,8,9
The current state of workplace mistreatment among emergency medicine (EM) residents remains unclear. Studies have documented workplace mistreatment in medicine, especially toward individuals with lower status in the medical workforce hierarchy.1,4,6,10,11,12 To our knowledge, the most recent comprehensive research on perceived mistreatment occurred more than 25 years ago in a study of 1774 EM residents.13 More recent work on harassment of EM residents has been limited by small sample sizes.14,15
Although there is a paucity of data on EM residents and their mistreatment experiences, a recent study of EM faculty revealed that women perceived significantly greater gender-based discrimination compared with men; 52.9% of female EM faculty and 26.2% of male EM faculty reported having experienced unwanted sexual behavior in the workplace at some point during their careers.16 Similarly, EM faculty from underrepresented racial/ethnic populations or sexual minority groups reported greater discrimination based on race/ethnicity or sexual orientation, respectively, compared with their colleagues.16
To understand the current prevalence of perceived workplace mistreatment among EM residents, a survey was administered to all residents enrolled in EM residencies accredited by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) to investigate the frequency, types, and sources of mistreatment. This study also examined the prevalence of suicidal ideation among EM residents in the US and assessed the associations between workplace mistreatment and suicidal ideation.
Methods
Study Settings and Participants
In this survey study conducted from February 25 to 29, 2020, a multiple-choice survey (eAppendix in the Supplement) was administered after the 2020 American Board of Emergency Medicine (ABEM) In-training Examination (ITE), an annual computer-based examination taken by residents training in ACGME-accredited EM residencies. In accordance with guiding principles of the American Association for Public Opinion Research (AAPOR), participants were provided a statement before the survey that informed them of the survey’s purpose and that it was voluntary, all data would be deidentified, program directors and department chairs would not have access to any responses, and participation would have no effect on the results of any ABEM examination. The Northwestern University institutional review board deemed this study as exempt because the responses were anonymous; voluntary participation in the study was considered consent to participate.
The survey used in this study was adapted from published surveys and therefore had substantial validity evidence for its use.1,17,18,19,20 All survey responses were recorded and stored in a highly secure server, deidentified by the ABEM, and submitted to Northwestern University’s Surgical Outcomes & Quality Improvement Center, which has relevant expertise in the data management and methodological approach that was used. Only residents enrolled in categorical, ACGME-accredited EM programs were included in the statistical analysis. Residents enrolled in other types of EM training such as combined EM programs (231 residents in 26 programs) and programs outside the US (54 residents in 4 programs) were excluded (Figure).
Figure. Flowchart of Residents and Programs Included in the Study.
ABEM ITE, American Board of Emergency Medicine In-training Examination; ACGME, Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education; EM, emergency medicine.
Mistreatment Exposures
Respondents were asked to self-report21 the frequency of mistreatment since the beginning of the July 2019 academic year and to identify the primary source of mistreatment. Mistreatment types included discrimination based on self-identified gender, race/ethnicity, sexual orientation, and pregnancy or childcare status; physical, verbal, or emotional abuse; and sexual harassment. Frequency of mistreatment was categorized as never experienced, a few times a year, a few times a month, a few times a week, or every day. A single composite indicator was constructed for primary comparisons, representing the maximum reported frequency of any of the mistreatment exposures. Residents were then categorized by frequency of exposure to mistreatment into 1 of 3 groups: (1) no exposure, (2) exposures a few times per year, or (3) exposures a few times or more per month, including a few times per week or every day. Potential sources of mistreatment included patients and/or patients’ family members, attending physicians, other residents or fellows, administrators, nurses, and support staff.
Suicidal Thoughts
Suicidal thoughts were assessed by asking residents at the end of the survey, “During the past 12 months, have you had thoughts of taking your own life?” After this question, participants were presented with a written statement urging them to seek their program director’s assistance if needed and were given the National Suicide Prevention Line contact information.
Resident and Program Characteristics
Residents were queried about and self-reported gender, race/ethnicity, marital status, sexual orientation, and number of dependents (adult or child). Answer options were defined by the study investigators. The ABEM provided the clinical postgraduate year (PGY), categorized as PGY 1, PGY 2, PGY 3, or PGY 4, for each deidentified resident and program characteristics including program format (3-year or 4-year). Specific program information, such as name, city, and state, was also deidentified.
Statistical Analysis
To compare the unadjusted prevalence of dichotomized mistreatment exposures and outcomes stratified by gender and race/ethnicity, we used the Pearson χ2 test with α = 0.01. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to examine all available resident and program characteristics associated with suicidal thoughts both including and excluding the composite mistreatment exposure. Clustered robust standard error adjustment was applied to all models to account for clustering within EM residencies. In each model, residents with missing responses for any of the variables and outcomes were excluded from the data analysis (exclusion rate, 10.0%-12.5%). Odds ratios with Bonferroni-corrected 99% CIs are reported. Significance was set at P < .05 using a 2-tailed test. All statistical analyses were performed using R, version 3.6.2 (R Project for Statistical Computing).
Results
Survey Response
Altogether, 243 ACGME-accredited EM residency programs participated in the ITE, and 1 (23 residents) did not. Of the 8162 eligible EM residents, 7680 (94.1%) responded to at least 1 question on the survey; 6503 (79.7%) completed the survey in its entirety. The study cohort included 4768 male residents (62.1%), 2698 female residents (35.1%), 4919 non-Hispanic White residents (64.0%), and 2620 residents (34.1%) from other racial/ethnic groups (African American, 282 [3.7%]; Asian or Pacific Islander, 1042 [13.6%]; Hispanic or Latino, 329 [4.3%]; Native American or Alaska Native, 33 [0.4%]; and mixed race or other, 934 [12.2%]). A total of 483 residents (6.3%) identified as lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, or other (LGBTQ+), and 5951 (77.5%) were married or in a relationship (Table 1). Of the total participants, 3463 (45.1%) reported exposure to some type of workplace mistreatment (eg, discrimination, abuse, or harassment) during the most recent academic year. A frequent source of mistreatment was identified as patients and/or patients’ families; 1234 respondents (58.7%) reported gender discrimination, 867 (67.5%) racial discrimination, 282 (85.2%) physical abuse, and 723 (69.1%) sexual harassment from patients and/or family members.
Table 1. Study Population Demographics, Stratified by Self-reported Gender and Race/Ethnicity.
| Characteristic | Respondents, No. (%) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall (N = 7680) | Sex | Race/ethnicity | |||
| Men (n = 4768) | Women (n = 2698) | White (n = 4919) | Racial/ethnic minority groups (n = 2620) | ||
| Gender | |||||
| Male | 4768 (62.1) | NA | NA | 3170 (64.4) | 1531 (58.4) |
| Female | 2698 (35.1) | NA | NA | 1687 (34.3) | 984 (37.6) |
| Unknowna | 214 (2.8) | NA | NA | 62 (1.3) | 105 (4.0) |
| Race/ethnicity | |||||
| Non-Hispanic White | 4919 (64.0) | 3170 (66.5) | 1687 (62.5) | 4919 (100.0) | NA |
| African American | 282 (3.7) | 145 (3.0) | 135 (5.0) | NA | 282 (10.8) |
| Asian or Pacific Islander | 1042 (13.6) | 631 (13.2) | 398 (14.8) | NA | 1042 (39.8) |
| Hispanic or Latino American | 329 (4.3) | 202 (4.2) | 124 (4.6) | NA | 329 (12.6) |
| Native American or Alaska Native | 33 (0.4) | 22 (0.5) | 6 (0.2) | NA | 33 (1.3) |
| Other or mixedb | 934 (12.2) | 531 (11.1) | 321 (11.9) | NA | 934 (35.6) |
| Unknown | 141 (1.8) | 67 (1.4) | 27 (1.0) | NA | NA |
| Sexual orientation | |||||
| Not LGBTQ+ | 6900 (89.8) | 4389 (92.1) | 2428 (90.0) | 4560 (92.7) | 2324 (88.7) |
| LGBTQ+ | 483 (6.3) | 259 (5.4) | 205 (7.6) | 307 (6.2) | 176 (6.7) |
| Other | 132 (1.7) | 39 (0.8) | 32 (1.2) | 34 (0.7) | 98 (3.7) |
| Unknown | 165 (2.1) | 81 (1.7) | 33 (1.2) | 18 (0.4) | 22 (0.8) |
| Clinical postgraduate year | |||||
| 1 | 2522 (32.8) | 1580 (33.1) | 877 (32.5) | 1571 (31.9) | 897 (34.2) |
| 2 | 2335 (30.4) | 1462 (30.7) | 809 (30.0) | 1496 (30.4) | 800 (30.5) |
| 3 | 2227 (29.0) | 1388 (29.1) | 776 (28.8) | 1471 (29.9) | 722 (27.6) |
| 4 | 596 (7.8) | 338 (7.1) | 236 (8.7) | 381 (7.7) | 201 (7.7) |
| Residency format | |||||
| PGY 1-3 | 5300 (69.0) | 3374 (70.8) | 1780 (66.0) | 3489 (70.9) | 1720 (65.6) |
| PGY 1-4 | 2380 (31.0) | 1394 (29.2) | 918 (34.0) | 1430 (29.1) | 900 (34.4) |
| Program sizec | |||||
| Quartile 1 | 1334 (17.4) | 882 (18.5) | 415 (15.4) | 856 (17.4) | 450 (17.2) |
| Quartile 2 | 1391 (18.1) | 891 (18.7) | 463 (17.2) | 957 (19.5) | 414 (15.8) |
| Quartile 3 | 2222 (28.9) | 1365 (28.6) | 800 (29.7) | 1500 (30.5) | 688 (26.3) |
| Quartile 4 | 2733 (35.6) | 1630 (34.2) | 1020 (37.8) | 1606 (32.6) | 1068 (40.8) |
| Residency regiond | |||||
| 1 | 1124 (14.6) | 680 (14.3) | 408 (15.1) | 686 (13.9) | 417 (15.9) |
| 2 | 752 (9.8) | 481 (10.1) | 254 (9.4) | 521 (10.6) | 220 (8.4) |
| 3 | 767 (10.0) | 493 (10.3) | 254 (9.4) | 533 (10.8) | 227 (8.7) |
| 4 | 1088 (14.2) | 689 (14.5) | 364 (13.5) | 670 (13.6) | 399 (15.2) |
| 5 | 1311 (17.1) | 845 (17.7) | 431 (16.0) | 963 (19.6) | 328 (12.5) |
| 6 | 1156 (15.1) | 686 (14.4) | 444 (16.5) | 770 (15.7) | 366 (14.0) |
| 7 | 1482 (19.3) | 894 (18.8) | 543 (20.1) | 776 (15.8) | 663 (25.3) |
| Relationship status | |||||
| Married or in a relationship | 5951 (77.5) | 3837 (80.5) | 1980 (73.4) | 4010 (81.5) | 1904 (72.7) |
| Not in a relationship | 1511 (19.7) | 833 (17.5) | 649 (24.1) | 827 (16.8) | 675 (25.8) |
| Divorced or widowed | 105 (1.4) | 51 (1.1) | 45 (1.7) | 71 (1.4) | 34 (1.3) |
| Unknown | 113 (1.5) | 47 (1.0) | 24 (0.9) | 11 (0.2) | 7 (0.3) |
| Pregnancy or childcare | |||||
| Yes | 1544 (20.1) | 1158 (24.3) | 335 (12.4) | 1161 (23.6) | 373 (14.2) |
| No | 5972 (77.8) | 3531 (74.1) | 2330 (86.4) | 3740 (76.0) | 2216 (84.6) |
| Unknown | 164 (2.1) | 79 (1.7) | 33 (1.2) | 18 (0.4) | 31 (1.2) |
| Other dependent(s) | |||||
| Yes | 287 (3.7) | 170 (3.6) | 98 (3.6) | 154 (3.1) | 132 (5.0) |
| No | 7190 (93.6) | 4495 (94.3) | 2555 (94.7) | 4732 (96.2) | 2438 (93.1) |
| Unknown | 203 (2.6) | 103 (2.2) | 45 (1.7) | 33 (0.7) | 50 (1.9) |
Abbreviations: LGBTQ+, lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, or other; NA, not applicable; PGY, postgraduate year.
Includes residents who selected “prefer not to answer” and those who skipped this question.
Other included those who did not identify as one of the racial/ethnic groups listed on the survey as a response choice.
Quartile 1 was less than 25 residents; quartile 2, 25 to 32 residents; quartile 3, 33 to 42 residents; and quartile 4, more than 42 residents.
Residency regions were the Medical Student Section Regions defined by the American Medical Association.
Mistreatment
As shown in Table 2, gender discrimination was reported by 2104 residents (29.5%; 1635 women [65.2%]; 407 men [9.1%]; P < .001), with the most common sources for both men and women being patients or patients’ family members (1027 women [62.8%]; 184 men [45.2%]) followed by nurses or staff (331 women [20.2%]; 59 men [14.5%]) (Table 3). Racial discrimination was reported by 1284 residents (18.0%), including 371 White residents (7.9%) and 907 residents from other racial/ethnic groups (37.6%) (P < .001). In addition, 248 residents (10.3%) from other racial/ethnic groups reported a frequency of exposure to racial discrimination as a few times per month or more. The most common source of racial discrimination reported was patients or patients’ family members (224 White residents [60.4%]; 639 residents from other racial/ethnic groups [70.5%]).
Table 2. Frequency of Resident Mistreatment Among the Study Population by Gender and Race/Ethnicity.
| Type of mistreatment | Residents experiencing mistreatment, No. (%) | P value | Residents experiencing mistreatment, No. (%) | P value | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall (N = 7680) | Sex | Race/ethnicity | |||||
| Men (n = 4768) | Women (n = 2698) | White (n = 4919) | Not White (n = 2620) | ||||
| Discrimination based on gender | |||||||
| Overall | 2104 (29.5) | 407 (9.1) | 1635 (65.2) | <.001 | 1330 (28.2) | 764 (31.7) | .002 |
| A few times per year | 1342 (18.8) | 358 (8.0) | 952 (37.9) | NA | 855 (18.2) | 480 (19.9) | NA |
| A few times per month or more frequently | 762 (10.7) | 49 (1.1) | 683 (27.2) | NA | 475 (10.1) | 284 (11.8) | NA |
| Discrimination based on race/ethnicity | |||||||
| Overall | 1284 (18.0) | 695 (15.5) | 548 (21.9) | <.001 | 371 (7.9) | 907 (37.6) | <.001 |
| A few times per year | 970 (13.6) | 543 (12.1) | 407 (16.2) | NA | 307 (6.5) | 659 (27.3) | NA |
| A few times per month or more frequently | 314 (4.4) | 152 (3.4) | 141 (5.6) | NA | 64 (1.4) | 248 (10.3) | NA |
| Discrimination based on sexual orientation | |||||||
| Overall | 220 (3.1) | 139 (3.1) | 68 (2.7) | .41 | 142 (3.0) | 77 (3.2) | .71 |
| A few times per year | 173 (2.4) | 116 (2.6) | 51 (2.0) | NA | 118 (2.5) | 54 (2.3) | NA |
| A few times per month or more frequently | 47 (0.7) | 23 (0.5) | 17 (0.7) | NA | 24 (0.5) | 23 (1.0) | NA |
| Discrimination based on pregnancy or childcare status | |||||||
| Overall | 365 (5.1) | 79 (1.8) | 270 (10.8) | <.001 | 264 (5.6) | 98 (4.1) | .007 |
| A few times per year | 283 (4.0) | 55 (1.2) | 221 (8.8) | NA | 214 (4.6) | 68 (2.8) | NA |
| A few times per month or more frequently | 82 (1.2) | 24 (0.5) | 49 (2.0) | NA | 50 (1.1) | 30 (1.3) | NA |
| Any discriminationa | |||||||
| Overall | 2665 (34.7) | 921 (19.3) | 1677 (62.2) | <.001 | 1489 (30.3) | 1165 (44.5) | <.001 |
| A few times per year | 1717 (24.2) | 730 (16.3) | 956 (38.4) | NA | 962 (20.5) | 748 (31.3) | NA |
| A few times per month or more frequently | 919 (12.9) | 184 (4.1) | 704 (28.3) | NA | 516 (11.0) | 400 (16.8) | NA |
| Verbal or emotional abuse | |||||||
| Overall | 2069 (29.0) | 1212 (27.0) | 806 (32.2) | <.001 | 1269 (27.0) | 790 (32.9) | <.001 |
| A few times per year | 1436 (20.1) | 851 (19.0) | 556 (22.2) | NA | 894 (19.0) | 537 (22.3) | NA |
| A few times per month or more frequently | 633 (8.9) | 361 (8.0) | 250 (10.0) | NA | 375 (8.0) | 253 (10.5) | NA |
| Physical abuse | |||||||
| Overall | 331 (4.6) | 207 (4.6) | 111 (4.4) | .77 | 201 (4.3) | 126 (5.2) | .07 |
| A few times per year | 285 (4.0) | 171 (3.8) | 104 (4.2) | NA | 175 (3.7) | 107 (4.5) | NA |
| A few times per month or more frequently | 46 (0.6) | 36 (0.8) | 7 (0.3) | NA | 26 (0.6) | 19 (0.8) | NA |
| Any abuseb | |||||||
| Overall | 2086 (27.2) | 1220 (25.6) | 814 (30.2) | <.001 | 1282 (26.1) | 794 (30.3) | <.001 |
| A few times per year | 1449 (20.4) | 857 (19.1) | 562 (22.5) | NA | 904 (19.2) | 540 (22.5) | NA |
| A few times per month or more frequently | 624 (8.8) | 357 (8.0) | 246 (9.8) | NA | 372 (7.9) | 247 (10.3) | NA |
| Sexual harassment | |||||||
| Overall | 1047 (14.7) | 294 (6.5) | 721 (28.8) | <.001 | 695 (14.8) | 347 (14.4) | .72 |
| A few times per year | 846 (11.9) | 264 (5.9) | 556 (22.2) | NA | 557 (11.8) | 285 (11.9) | NA |
| A few times per month or more frequently | 201 (2.8) | 30 (0.7) | 165 (6.6) | NA | 138 (2.9) | 62 (2.6) | NA |
| Any exposure to discrimination, abuse, or harassment | |||||||
| Overall | 3463 (45.1) | 1604 (33.6) | 1777 (65.9) | <.001 | 2079 (42.3) | 1368 (52.2) | <.001 |
| A few times per year | 2117 (29.9) | 1117 (25.0) | 964 (38.8) | NA | 1297 (27.7) | 811 (34.0) | NA |
| A few times per month or more frequently | 1296 (18.3) | 469 (10.5) | 788 (31.7) | NA | 761 (16.3) | 529 (22.2) | NA |
| Suicidal thoughts | 178 (2.5) | 108 (2.4) | 59 (2.4) | .96 | 113 (2.4) | 65 (2.7) | .51 |
Abbreviation: NA, not applicable.
Discrimination based on gender, race, sexual orientation, or pregnancy or childcare status.
Verbal, emotional, or physical abuse.
Table 3. Sources of Mistreatment, by Relevant Subgroups.
| Type of mistreatment | Residents experiencing mistreatment, No. (%) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total, No. | Source of mistreatment | ||||||
| Patients or family | Attending physicians | Administration | Other residents or fellows | Nurses or staff | No response | ||
| Gender discrimination | |||||||
| All | 2104 | 1234 (58.7) | 175 (8.3) | 16 (0.8) | 89 (4.2) | 406 (19.3) | 184 (8.7) |
| Men | 407 | 184 (45.2) | 45 (11.1) | 9 (2.2) | 34 (8.4) | 59 (14.5) | 76 (18.7) |
| Women | 1635 | 1027 (62.8) | 124 (7.6) | 6 (0.4) | 53 (3.2) | 331 (20.2) | 94 (5.7) |
| Discrimination based on sexual orientation | |||||||
| All | 220 | 98 (44.5) | 19 (8.6) | 4 (1.8) | 30 (13.6) | 14 (6.4) | 55 (25.0) |
| Not LGBTQ+ | 89 | 25 (28.1) | 4 (4.5) | 2 (2.2) | 12 (13.5) | 8 (9.0) | 38 (42.7) |
| LGBTQ+ | 130 | 73 (56.2) | 15 (11.5) | 2 (1.5) | 18 (13.8) | 6 (4.6) | 16 (12.3) |
| Discrimination based on pregnancy or childcare status | |||||||
| All | 365 | 53 (14.5) | 97 (26.6) | 28 (7.7) | 82 (22.5) | 23 (6.3) | 82 (22.5) |
| Not associated with parenting | 177 | 34 (19.2) | 41 (23.2) | 11 (6.2) | 25 (14.1) | 14 (7.9) | 52 (29.4) |
| Associated with parenting | 186 | 18 (9.7) | 55 (29.6) | 17 (9.1) | 57 (30.6) | 9 (4.8) | 30 (16.1) |
| Discrimination based on race/ethnicity | |||||||
| All | 1284 | 867 (67.5) | 60 (4.7) | 18 (1.4) | 61 (4.8) | 107 (8.3) | 171 (13.3) |
| White | 371 | 224 (60.4) | 16 (4.3) | 9 (2.4) | 22 (5.9) | 23 (6.2) | 77 (20.8) |
| Not White | 907 | 639 (70.5) | 44 (4.9) | 9 (1.0) | 38 (4.2) | 84 (9.3) | 93 (10.3) |
| Verbal or emotional abuse | |||||||
| All | 2069 | 1231 (59.5) | 388 (18.8) | 15 (0.7) | 125 (6.0) | 141 (6.8) | 169 (8.2) |
| Men | 1212 | 702 (57.9) | 259 (21.4) | 9 (0.7) | 82 (6.8) | 81 (6.7) | 79 (6.5) |
| Women | 806 | 503 (62.4) | 120 (14.9) | 6 (0.7) | 42 (5.2) | 55 (6.8) | 80 (9.9) |
| Physical abuse | |||||||
| All | 331 | 282 (85.2) | 6 (1.8) | 2 (0.6) | 3 (0.9) | 3 (0.9) | 35 (10.6) |
| Men | 207 | 182 (87.9) | 4 (1.9) | 2 (1.0) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (0.5) | 18 (8.7) |
| Women | 111 | 95 (85.6) | 2 (1.8) | 0 (0.0) | 2 (1.8) | 1 (0.9) | 11 (9.9) |
| Sexual harassment | |||||||
| All | 1047 | 723 (69.1) | 52 (5.0) | 6 (0.6) | 33 (3.2) | 127 (12.1) | 106 (10.1) |
| Men | 294 | 181 (61.6) | 5 (1.7) | 2 (0.7) | 7 (2.4) | 64 (21.8) | 35 (11.9) |
| Women | 721 | 525 (72.8) | 46 (6.4) | 4 (0.6) | 23 (3.2) | 61 (8.5) | 62 (8.6) |
Abbreviation: LGBTQ+, lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, or other.
Discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender identity was reported by 220 residents (3.1%). Most LGBTQ+ residents (73 of 130 [56.2%]) who reported discrimination identified patients or patients’ families as the primary source, whereas 18 (13.8%) identified other residents as the primary source.
Discrimination based on pregnancy or childcare status was reported by 365 residents (5.1%), including 270 women (10.8%) and 79 men (1.8%) (P < .001). Among the 186 residents who self-identified as parents (defined as respondents who reported having children younger than 18 years or respondents who were or whose partner was pregnant, adopting, or expecting a child from July 2019 to the date of the ABEM ITE examination), 57 (30.6%) identified other residents as the primary source of discrimination and 55 (29.6%) identified attending physicians.
Sexual harassment was reported by 1047 residents (14.7%), including 721 women (28.8%) and 294 men (6.5%) (P < .001). The main source was identified as patients and/or patients’ family members (525 women [72.8%]; 181 men [61.6%]), followed by nurses and staff (64 men [21.8%]; 61 women [8.5%]).
Overall, 2069 residents (29.0%) reported verbal or emotional abuse, including 806 women (32.2%) and 1212 men (27.0%) (P < .001). The most common sources were patients or patients’ family members (503 women [62.4%]; 702 men [57.9%]), followed by attending physicians (259 men [21.4%]; 120 women [14.9%]). Physical abuse was reported by 331 residents (4.6%) and was primarily attributed to patients or patients’ families.
Suicidal Thoughts and Associated Factors
Suicidal thoughts were reported by 178 residents (2.5%), with similar prevalence by gender (108 men [2.4%]; 59 women [2.4%]) and race/ethnicity (113 non-Hispanic White individuals [2.4%]; 65 residents from other racial/ethnic groups [2.7%]).
In the adjusted models for suicidal thoughts, the prevalence was greater for residents who identified as LGBTQ+ (odds ratio [OR], 2.04; 99% CI, 1.04-3.99) (Table 4). Residents who were divorced or widowed had greater odds of reporting suicidal thoughts (OR, 3.36; 99% CI, 1.06-10.70) compared with residents who were married or in a relationship.
Table 4. Odds of Experiencing Suicidal Thoughts by Resident Characteristic, Adjusted for PGY, Relationship Status, Program Size, and Program Location.
| Characteristic | Residents with suicidal thoughts, No. (%) (N = 6721) | Odds ratio (99% CI) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Excluding mistreatment measures | Including mistreatment measures | ||
| Overall | 159 (2.4) | NA | NA |
| Gender | |||
| Male | 104 (2.4) | 1 [Reference] | 1 [Reference] |
| Female | 55 (2.3) | 0.90 (0.58-1.40) | 0.54 (0.34-0.86) |
| Race/ethnicity | |||
| White | 102 (2.3) | 1 [Reference] | 1 [Reference] |
| Racial/ethnic minority groups | 57 (2.6) | 1.15 (0.73-1.79) | 0.99 (0.62-1.58) |
| Clinical PGY | |||
| 1 | 45 (2.0) | 1 [Reference] | 1 [Reference] |
| 2 | 60 (2.9) | 1.36 (0.84-2.21) | 1.22 (0.72-2.06) |
| 3-4 | 54 (2.2) | 0.99 (0.56-1.75) | 0.83 (0.46-1.49) |
| Residency format | |||
| PGY 1-3 | 108 (2.3) | 1 [Reference] | 1 [Reference] |
| PGY 1-4 | 51 (2.5) | 0.94 (0.57-1.55) | 0.89 (0.52-1.51) |
| Sexual orientation | |||
| Not LGBTQ+ | 136 (2.2) | 1 [Reference] | 1 [Reference] |
| LGBTQ+ | 23 (4.7) | 2.41 (1.29-4.50) | 2.04 (1.04-3.99) |
| Relationship status | |||
| Married or in a relationship | 116 (2.2) | 1 [Reference] | 1 [Reference] |
| No relationship | 37 (2.8) | 1.34 (0.92-1.96) | 1.23 (0.75-2.01) |
| Divorced or widowed | 6 (7.1) | 4.28 (1.91-9.62) | 3.36 (1.06-10.70) |
| Pregnancy or childcare | |||
| Yes | 126 (2.4) | 1.10 (0.59-2.04) | 1.11 (0.59-2.09) |
| No | 33 (2.4) | 1 [Reference] | 1 [Reference] |
| Other dependent(s) | |||
| Yes | 150 (2.3) | 1.62 (0.62-4.23) | 1.70 (0.65-4.48) |
| No | 9 (3.8) | 1 [Reference] | 1 [Reference] |
| Program sizea | |||
| Quartile 1 | 26 (2.2) | 1 [Reference] | 1 [Reference] |
| Quartile 2 | 17 (1.4) | 0.53 (0.25-1.14) | 0.59 (0.27-1.27) |
| Quartile 3 | 58 (2.9) | 1.16 (0.64-2.10) | 1.24 (0.68-2.27) |
| Quartile 4 | 58 (2.5) | 1.02 (0.55-1.91) | 0.99 (0.51-1.91) |
| Residency regionb | |||
| 1 | 28 (2.9) | 1 [Reference] | 1 [Reference] |
| 2 | 22 (3.2) | 1.12 (0.50-2.49) | 1.18 (0.53-2.66) |
| 3 | 16 (2.4) | 0.77 (0.36-1.64) | 0.93 (0.44-1.98) |
| 4 | 14 (1.5) | 0.53 (0.22-1.25) | 0.52 (0.23-1.21) |
| 5 | 26 (2.2) | 0.83 (0.40-1.72) | 0.86 (0.40-1.82) |
| 6 | 26 (2.5) | 0.81 (0.37-1.74) | 0.88 (0.40-1.92) |
| 7 | 27 (2.1) | 0.74 (0.37-1.48) | 0.65 (0.31-1.35) |
| Frequency of mistreatment | |||
| Never | 47 (1.3) | NA | 1 [Reference] |
| A few times per year | 42 (2.1) | NA | 1.69 (0.90-3.15) |
| A few times per month or more | 70 (5.8) | NA | 5.83 (3.70-9.20) |
Abbreviations: LGBTQ+, lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, or other; NA, not applicable; PGY, postgraduate year.
Quartile 1 was less than 25 residents; quartile 2, 25 to 32 residents; quartile 3, 33 to 42 residents; and quartile 4, more than 42 residents.
Residency regions were the Medical Student Section Regions defined by the American Medical Association.
An association was observed between experiencing mistreatment at least a few times per month and having suicidal thoughts (OR, 5.83; 99% CI, 3.70-9.20). Residents who had never experienced mistreatment or had experienced it only a few times a year did not report having suicidal thoughts. After adjusting for mistreatment exposures, women were less likely than men to report suicidal thoughts (OR, 0.54; 99% CI, 0.34-0.86).
Discussion
In this comprehensive survey study, mistreatment of EM residents based on gender, race/ethnicity, and sexual orientation was more common among women, residents from racial/ethnic minority populations, and residents identifying as LGBTQ+, respectively. Discrimination based on pregnancy and childcare status was also more common among women than among men. Although expectant fathers were not separately counted, they were included because the survey did not specifically state the gender of the expectant parent but rather the childcare status of the resident. Workplace mistreatment was associated with suicidal thoughts; however, after adjusting for mistreatment, women were less likely than men to report suicidal ideation. Given the high response rates to the survey, the investigators were confident that the study population represented the general population of EM residents.
Working in the emergency department is associated with a higher risk for violence, abuse, and harassment because of its high-stress, fast-paced environment15,22,23 and exposure to certain patient populations who seek emergency care (eg, patients with psychiatric diagnoses, intoxicated patients,24 and incarcerated patients22). Workplace violence is associated with an increase in the likelihood of burnout, depression, and posttraumatic stress disorder in physicians.25 In this study, 45.1% of all EM residents reported some form of mistreatment, which was less than the 98% of EM residents who reported at least 1 occurrence of abuse or harassment in a 1993 survey13 in which many residents noted that abuse from patients was “just part of the job.”13
Broad cultural changes and movements within medicine and society at large (including TIME’S UP Healthcare, #MeToo, #HeForShe, White Coats for Black Lives, and Black Lives Matter) have raised awareness of the detriment of systemic racism26 and the benefits of diversity and equity27 and may be associated with decreased reporting of discrimination in the workplace during the past 3 decades.28 It is possible that respondents to the current study’s survey may have underreported mistreatment owing to differences in study design. In contrast to the 1993 study,13 discrimination, abuse, and harassment were intentionally not defined in this study but were left open to respondent interpretation. Whether changing definitions of mistreatment affects reporting rates is unknown, and this is an area for future research.29
Identifying sources of mistreatment is important because it helps inform how institutions and individuals should intervene. Consistent with the findings of the current study, patients or their families have remained the most frequent source of all forms of mistreatment in the past 27 years.13 However, respondents to this survey indicated that discrimination based on pregnancy and childcare status was perpetrated most often by attending physicians and other residents.
Women reported higher levels of nearly all forms of mistreatment compared with men, with most of the reported gender-based mistreatment originating from patients and their families. The second most likely source of gender-based mistreatment was nurses and staff. Gender bias, discrimination, and sexual harassment in medicine have deleterious consequences for women physicians’ careers and well-being.10,12,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39
Mistreatment of primarily women in medicine may be associated with fewer women seeking EM careers, and the comparative underrepresentation of women in EM may be associated with their greater mistreatment. More than 50% of medical student matriculants are female; however, female physicians receive less compensation, opportunity for advancement, scholarship, and recognition compared with men,12,32,38 and EM is no exception. Women represent approximately 30% of emergency physicians, and this percentage has been consistent for the past decade.40 A study by Madsen et al12 showed that salaries for women in academic EM were at least $19 000 less than those for their male peers. Women in EM represent a minority of professors and department chairs.38,41 Women are also less likely to be first authors of scholarly work and less likely to be part of editorial boards for the major specialty journals.42,43 The findings of this study are consistent with prior work showing gender discrimination and mistreatment in academic medicine.44 Institutional policies that recognize bias, destigmatize reporting, and promote education regarding inclusivity may be helpful.
Emergency medicine physicians are predominantly White individuals, and there are comparatively few physicians in the specialty who identify as underrepresented in medicine.45,46,47,48 In the cohort of EM residents in the present study, most residents (64.0%) identified as non-Hispanic White, and few residents identified as African American (3.7%) or Hispanic or Latino American (4.3%). Racial bias and discrimination are present in medicine, and subtle forms of bias and discrimination may begin in medical school.45,49 Resident physicians have reported experiencing many microaggressions daily and bias during their training.50 The findings of this study are consistent with prior work in which individuals who identified as underrepresented in medicine were found to have experienced higher rates of discrimination than their peers who did not identify as underrepresented in medicine.30,51,52
Discrimination by patients toward physicians also occurs on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity.53,54 In this study, discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender identity was reported by 3.1% of residents. Of the residents who identified as LGBTQ+ and who reported discrimination, 56.2% identified patients or families as the primary source and 13.8% identified the primary source as other residents.
Suicidal Thoughts
In this study, 2.5% of the EM residents reported having suicidal thoughts during the July 2019 to February 2020 academic year (Table 2), which was lower than the rate reported in previous studies.1,55,56,57,58,59 Similar to the findings of other work,60,61,62,63 residents in this study who identified as LGBTQ+ and those who were divorced or widowed reported higher rates of suicidal thoughts. Physician suicide should be equated to a “never event” (an event that is preventable and should never occur), highlighting the need for even greater suicide prevention initiatives. Compared with the general population, physicians have a higher likelihood of suicide, and female physicians are at greater risk than male physicians.64,65 In this study, there was a significant association between the reported frequency of mistreatment and suicidal thoughts. After adjusting for mistreatment, women were less likely to report suicidal thoughts. The results suggest that the higher prevalence of mistreatment experienced by women in medicine may be 1 factor associated with the higher rates of suicide among female physicians. Systemic interventions appear to be needed to address workplace mistreatment. Leaders, peers, and other hospital colleagues may be bystanders, perhaps inadvertently, to workplace mistreatment. Health care systems, hospitals, and department and residency program leaders should consider training interventions to empower bystanders to intervene and to cultivate workplace norms that prohibit workplace mistreatment.66 An additional strategy is to provide cultural competency training to all emergency department staff with the goal of increasing collective knowledge about marginalized groups (women and individuals who are underrepresented in medicine or LGBTQ+) that are at increased risk of experiencing workplace mistreatment.67,68 This increase in knowledge and subsequent self-awareness may create a more open, safe, and supportive workplace for EM residents.
There is a paucity of data on resident mistreatment. A survey1 regarding mistreatment and suicidal ideation was conducted in 2018 among general surgery residents, and compared with findings of that study, EM residents in this study reported lower rates of suicidal ideation (EM vs surgery: 2.5% vs 4.5%) but higher rates of sexual harassment (EM vs surgery: 28.8% vs 19.9%). Both EM and general surgery are predominantly male specialties, and future work should compare these results with those from other specialties.
Residents in many programs are likely able to train in environments without frequent exposures to discrimination, harassment, or abuse. Mistreatment should never be considered an acceptable occurrence in any training program. This study was not able to examine which systems, programs, or cultural factors were associated with lower rates of mistreatment in some institutions and higher rates in others. Qualitative studies of residents and program leaders from institutions with varying levels of reported mistreatment may help address this question.
Limitations
This study has limitations. Although all data were deidentified, it is conceivable that concern regarding identification of respondents may have resulted in underreporting of harassment owing to fear of retaliation. Social-desirability bias may have contributed to underreporting to portray strength and stamina as an emergency physician. Although unlikely, it is also conceivable that overreporting might have occurred owing to the anonymous nature of the survey. No option for discrimination based on gender identity was provided in the survey. As a result, residents identifying as nonbinary may have responded based on their gender or sexual orientation, limiting the degree to which discrimination based on gender identity in this study could be assessed.
The consequences of administering the survey after the 4.5-hour, 225 multiple-choice question ITE are also unknown. This type of approach has a precedence because a similar survey on resident mistreatment was previously conducted by the American Board of Surgery.1 Given the length and duration of the ITE, residents may not have been inclined to participate in the survey or to complete it in its entirety. Nonetheless, the survey response rate was high. Examination-related anxiety may have been associated with reporting more negative feelings. On the contrary, relief from completing the examination may have diminished negative feelings. In addition, there may be inherent recall bias owing to the time lapse between the start of the academic year and the ITE administration in the subsequent February.
In the current study, mistreatment definitions were not provided but instead were open to the resident’s interpretation. Therefore, the number of reported mistreatment occurrences may have been lower than the actual occurrences. As reported previously, many EM clinicians consider verbal abuse, insults, and other derogatory behavior to be normal and just a part of the job.13 As a result, emergency department violence, abuse, and harassment are likely to be underreported.23,69
Conclusions
In this survey study, EM residents reported commonly experiencing workplace mistreatment, and experiences of mistreatment were associated with suicidality. Identifying and promoting best practices to minimize workplace mistreatment during residency may help optimize the professional career experience and improve the personal and professional well-being of physicians throughout their lives.
eAppendix. Survey
References
- 1.Hu YY, Ellis RJ, Hewitt DB, et al. Discrimination, abuse, harassment, and burnout in surgical residency training. N Engl J Med. 2019;381(18):1741-1752. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1903759 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Zhang LM, Ellis RJ, Ma M, et al. Prevalence, types, and sources of bullying reported by US general surgery residents in 2019. JAMA. 2020;323(20):2093-2095. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.2901 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Yuce TK, Turner PL, Glass C, et al. National evaluation of racial/ethnic discrimination in US surgical residency programs. JAMA Surg. 2020;155(6):526-528. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.0260 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Hill KA, Samuels EA, Gross CP, et al. Assessment of the prevalence of medical student mistreatment by sex, race/ethnicity, and sexual orientation. JAMA Intern Med. 2020;180(5):653-665. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.0030 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Fekedulegn D, Alterman T, Charles LE, et al. Prevalence of workplace discrimination and mistreatment in a national sample of older U.S. workers: the REGARDS cohort study. SSM Popul Health. 2019;8:100444. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2019.100444 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Nunez-Smith M, Pilgrim N, Wynia M, et al. Health care workplace discrimination and physician turnover. J Natl Med Assoc. 2009;101(12):1274-1282. doi: 10.1016/S0027-9684(15)31139-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Dhanani LY, Beus JM, Joseph DL. Workplace discrimination: a meta-analytic extension, critique, and future research agenda. Pers Psychol. 2017;71(2):147-179. doi: 10.1111/peps.12254 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Triana MdC, Jayasinghe M, Peiper JR. Perceived workplace racial discrimination and its correlates: a meta-analysis. J Organ Behav. 2015;36(4):491-513. doi: 10.1002/job.1988 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Harnois CE, Bastos JL. Discrimination, harassment, and gendered health inequalities: do perceptions of workplace mistreatment contribute to the gender gap in self-reported health? J Health Soc Behav. 2018;59(2):283-299. doi: 10.1177/0022146518767407 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Carr PL, Ash AS, Friedman RH, et al. Faculty perceptions of gender discrimination and sexual harassment in academic medicine. Ann Intern Med. 2000;132(11):889-896. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-132-11-200006060-00007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Sexual Harassment of Women: Climate, Culture and Consequences in Academic Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. National Academies Press; 2018. [PubMed]
- 12.Madsen TE, Linden JA, Rounds K, et al. Current status of gender and racial/ethnic disparities among academic emergency medicine physicians. Acad Emerg Med. 2017;24(10):1182-1192. doi: 10.1111/acem.13269 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.McNamara RM, Whitley TW, Sanders AB, Andrew LB; The SAEM In-service Survey Task Force . The extent and effects of abuse and harassment of emergency medicine residents. Acad Emerg Med. 1995;2(4):293-301. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.1995.tb03225.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Li SF, Grant K, Bhoj T, et al. Resident experience of abuse and harassment in emergency medicine: ten years later. J Emerg Med. 2010;38(2):248-252. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2008.05.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Schnapp BH, Slovis BH, Shah AD, et al. Workplace violence and harassment against emergency medicine residents. West J Emerg Med. 2016;17(5):567-573. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2016.6.30446 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Lu DW, Lall MD, Mitzman J, et al. #MeToo in EM: a multicenter survey of academic emergency medicine faculty on their experiences with gender discrimination and sexual harassment. West J Emerg Med. 2020;21(2):252-260. doi:10.5811/westjem.2019.11.44592 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Baker K, Durso LE, Ridings A. How to collect data about LGBT communities. Center for American Progress. March 15, 2016. Accessed January 7, 2021. https://www.americanprogress.org/issues/lgbtq-rights/reports/2016/03/15/133223/how-to-collect-data-about-lgbt-communities/
- 18.Badgett MVL, Baker KE, Conron KJ, et al. Best Practices for Asking Questions to Identify Transgender and Other Gender Minority Respondents on Population-Based Surveys (GenIUSS). The Williams Institute; 2014. Accessed January 7, 2021. https://williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/publications/geniuss-trans-pop-based-survey/ [Google Scholar]
- 19.Shanafelt TD, Balch CM, Dyrbye L, et al. Special report: suicidal ideation among American surgeons. Arch Surg. 2011;146(1):54-62. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2010.292 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Herrin J, Dyrbye LN. Notice of retraction and replacement. Dyrbye et al. Association of clinical specialty with symptoms of burnout and career choice regret among US resident physicians. JAMA. 2018;320(11):1114-1130. JAMA. 2019;321(12):1220-1221. doi:10.1001/jama.2019.0167 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Burkard AW, Boticki MA, Madson MB. Workplace discrimination, prejudice, and diversity measurement: a review of instrumentation. J Career Assess. 2002;10(3):343-361. doi: 10.1177/10672702010003005 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Stowell KR, Hughes NP, Rozel JS. Violence in the emergency department. Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2016;39(4):557-566. doi: 10.1016/j.psc.2016.07.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Copeland D, Henry M. Workplace violence and perceptions of safety among emergency department staff members: experiences, expectations, tolerance, reporting, and recommendations. J Trauma Nurs. 2017;24(2):65-77. doi: 10.1097/JTN.0000000000000269 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Kleissl-Muir S, Raymond A, Rahman MA. Incidence and factors associated with substance abuse and patient-related violence in the emergency department: a literature review. Australas Emerg Care. 2018;21(4):159-170. doi: 10.1016/j.auec.2018.10.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Zafar W, Khan UR, Siddiqui SA, Jamali S, Razzak JA. Workplace violence and self-reported psychological health: coping with post-traumatic stress, mental distress, and burnout among physicians working in the emergency departments compared to other specialties in Pakistan. J Emerg Med. 2016;50(1):167-77.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2015.02.049 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.American Medical Association. New AMA policy recognizes racism as a public health threat. November 16, 2020. Accessed May 25, 2021. https://www.ama-assn.org/press-center/press-releases/new-ama-policy-recognizes-racism-public-health-threat/
- 27.Rosenkranz KM, Arora TK, Termuhlen PM, et al. Diversity, equity and inclusion in medicine: why it matters and how do we achieve it? J Surg Educ. Published online December 3, 2020. doi:10.1016/j.jsurg.2020.11.013 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 28.US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission . Charge statistics (charges filed with EEOC) FY 1997 through FY 2020. Accessed May 25, 2021. https://www.eeoc.gov/statistics/charge-statistics-charges-filed-eeoc-fy-1997-through-fy-2020
- 29.Cook AF, Arora VM, Rasinski KA, Curlin FA, Yoon JD. The prevalence of medical student mistreatment and its association with burnout. Acad Med. 2014;89(5):749-754. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000204 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Coombs AA, King RK. Workplace discrimination: experiences of practicing physicians. J Natl Med Assoc. 2005;97(4):467-477. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Jena AB, Khullar D, Ho O, Olenski AR, Blumenthal DM. Sex differences in academic rank in US medical schools in 2014. JAMA. 2015;314(11):1149-1158. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.10680 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Jena AB, Olenski AR, Blumenthal DM. Sex differences in physician salary in US public medical schools. JAMA Intern Med. 2016;176(9):1294-1304. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.3284 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Association of American Medical Colleges Faculty Roster . Table C: Department chairs by department, sex, and race/ethnicity, 2020. Snapshot, as of December 31, 2019. Accessed January 7, 2021. https://www.aamc.org/system/files/2020-01/2017%20Supplemental%20Table%20C.pdf
- 34.Association of American Medical Colleges . U.S. medical school deans by dean type and sex. December 31 snapshots, AAMC Council of Deans, as of January 2021. Accessed January 7, 2021. https://www.aamc.org/data-reports/faculty-institutions/interactive-data/us-medical-school-deans-dean-type-and-sex
- 35.Seabury SA, Chandra A, Jena AB. Trends in the earnings of male and female health care professionals in the United States, 1987 to 2010. JAMA Intern Med. 2013;173(18):1748-1750. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.8519 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Frank E, Brogan D, Schiffman M. Prevalence and correlates of harassment among US women physicians. Arch Intern Med. 1998;158(4):352-358. doi: 10.1001/archinte.158.4.352 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Nora LM, McLaughlin MA, Fosson SE, et al. Gender discrimination and sexual harassment in medical education: perspectives gained by a 14-school study. Acad Med. 2002;77(12 Pt 1):1226-1234. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200212000-00018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Bennett CL, Raja AS, Kapoor N, et al. Gender differences in faculty rank among academic emergency physicians in the United States. Acad Emerg Med. 2019;26(3):281-285. doi: 10.1111/acem.13685 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Raj A, Freund KM, McDonald JM, Carr PL. Effects of sexual harassment on advancement of women in academic medicine: a multi-institutional longitudinal study. EClinicalMedicine. 2020;20:100298. doi:10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100298 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 40.Association of American Medical Colleges. Active physicians by sex and specialty, 2017. Accessed May 25, 2021. https://www.aamc.org/data-reports/workforce/interactive-data/active-physicians-sex-and-specialty-2017/
- 41.Association of American Medical Colleges Faculty Roster . Table 13: U.S. medical school faculty by sex, rank, and department, 2019. Snapshot, as of December 31, 2019. Accessed May 25, 2021. https://www.aamc.org/system/files/2020-01/2019Table13.pdf/
- 42.Kaji AH, Meurer WJ, Napper T, et al. ; Annals of Emergency Medicine Diversity Task Force . State of the journal: women first authors, peer reviewers, and editorial board members at Annals of Emergency Medicine. Ann Emerg Med. 2019;74(6):731-735. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2019.05.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Gottlieb M, Krzyzaniak SM, Mannix A, et al. Sex distribution of editorial board members among emergency medicine journals. Ann Emerg Med. Published online May 3, 2020. doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2020.03.027 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 44.Carr PL, Helitzer D, Freund K, et al. A summary report from the research partnership on women in science careers. J Gen Intern Med. 2019;34(3):356-362. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4547-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Boatright D, Ross D, O’Connor P, Moore E, Nunez-Smith M. Racial disparities in medical student membership in the Alpha Omega Alpha honor society. JAMA Intern Med. 2017;177(5):659-665. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.9623 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Association of American Medical Colleges Faculty Roster . 2019 US medical school faculty. Accessed May 25, 2021. https://www.aamc.org/data-reports/faculty-institutions/interactive-data/2019-us-medical-school-faculty/
- 47.Deville C, Hwang WT, Burgos R, Chapman CH, Both S, Thomas CR Jr. Diversity in graduate medical education in the United States by race, ethnicity, and sex, 2012. JAMA Intern Med. 2015;175(10):1706-1708. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.4324 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Partiali B, Oska S, Barbat A, Folbe A. The representation of women and underrepresented minorities in emergency medicine: a look into resident diversity. Am J Emerg Med. Published online April 1, 2020. doi:10.1016/j.ajem.2020.03.055 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 49.Ross DA, Boatright D, Nunez-Smith M, Jordan A, Chekroud A, Moore EZ. Differences in words used to describe racial and gender groups in medical student performance evaluations. PLoS One. 2017;12(8):e0181659. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0181659 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Osseo-Asare A, Balasuriya L, Huot SJ, et al. Minority resident physicians’ views on the role of race/ethnicity in their training experiences in the workplace. JAMA Netw Open. 2018;1(5):e182723. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.2723 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Nunez-Smith M, Pilgrim N, Wynia M, et al. Race/ethnicity and workplace discrimination: results of a national survey of physicians. J Gen Intern Med. 2009;24(11):1198-1204. doi: 10.1007/s11606-009-1103-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Peterson NB, Friedman RH, Ash AS, Franco S, Carr PL. Faculty self-reported experience with racial and ethnic discrimination in academic medicine. J Gen Intern Med. 2004;19(3):259-265. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.20409.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Druzin P, Shrier I, Yacowar M, Rossignol M. Discrimination against gay, lesbian and bisexual family physicians by patients. CMAJ. 1998;158(5):593-597. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Lee RS, Melhado TV, Chacko KM, White KJ, Huebschmann AG, Crane LA. The dilemma of disclosure: patient perspectives on gay and lesbian providers. J Gen Intern Med. 2008;23(2):142-147. doi: 10.1007/s11606-007-0461-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Laramée J, Kuhl D. Suicidal ideation among family practice residents at the University of British Columbia. Can Fam Physician. 2019;65(10):730-735. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Liu R, Van Aarsen K, Sedran R, Lim R. A national survey of burnout amongst Canadian Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada emergency medicine residents. Can Med Educ J. 2020;11(5):e56-e61. doi: 10.36834/cmej.68602 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Kane L. Medscape national physician burnout and suicide report 2020: the generational divide. Medscape. January 15, 2020. Accessed October 28, 2020. https://www.medscape.com/slideshow/2020-lifestyle-burnout-6012460
- 58.Taher A, Hart A, Dattani ND, et al. Emergency medicine resident wellness: lessons learned from a national survey. CJEM. 2018;20(5):721-724. doi: 10.1017/cem.2018.416 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention . Suicide: facts at a glance 2015. Accessed January 11, 2021. https://www.cdc.gov/suicide/facts/
- 60.Sutter M, Perrin PB. Discrimination, mental health, and suicidal ideation among LGBTQ people of color. J Couns Psychol. 2016;63(1):98-105. doi: 10.1037/cou0000126 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.King M, Semlyen J, Tai SS, et al. A systematic review of mental disorder, suicide, and deliberate self harm in lesbian, gay and bisexual people. BMC Psychiatry. 2008;8:70. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-8-70 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Haas AP, Eliason M, Mays VM, et al. Suicide and suicide risk in lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender populations: review and recommendations. J Homosex. 2011;58(1):10-51. doi: 10.1080/00918369.2011.534038 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Kyung-Sook W, SangSoo S, Sangjin S, Young-Jeon S. Marital status integration and suicide: a meta-analysis and meta-regression. Soc Sci Med. 2018;197:116-126. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.11.053 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Fink-Miller EL, Nestler LM. Suicide in physicians and veterinarians: risk factors and theories. Curr Opin Psychol. 2018;22:23-26. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.07.019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Schernhammer ES, Colditz GA. Suicide rates among physicians: a quantitative and gender assessment (meta-analysis). Am J Psychiatry. 2004;161(12):2295-2302. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.161.12.2295 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Schneider KT, Wesselmann ED, DeSouza ER. Confronting subtle workplace mistreatment: the importance of leaders as allies. Front Psychol. 2017;8:1051. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01051 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 67.Bristol S, Kostelec T, MacDonald R. Improving emergency health care workers’ knowledge, competency, and attitudes toward lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender patients through interdisciplinary cultural competency training. J Emerg Nurs. 2018;44(6):632-639. doi: 10.1016/j.jen.2018.03.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Jongen C, McCalman J, Bainbridge R. Health workforce cultural competency interventions: a systematic scoping review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018;18(1):232. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3001-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Richardson SK, Grainger PC, Ardagh MW, Morrison R. Violence and aggression in the emergency department is under-reported and under-appreciated. N Z Med J. 2018;131(1476):50-58. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
eAppendix. Survey