Table 4.
Select Agents in Development for the Treatment of DLBCL.*
| Class and Agent | Target | Clinical Trial Phase | Overall Response Rate | Complete Response Rate | Study |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| percent | |||||
| CAR T-cell therapy† | |||||
| Axicabtagene ciloleucel | CD19 | 1 | 82 | 54 | Neelapu et al.68 |
| Tisagenlecleucel | CD19 | 2 | 52 | 40 | Schuster et al.69 |
| Lisocabtagene maraleucel | CD19 | 1 | 73 | 53 | Abramson et al.67 |
| Monoclonal antibodies | |||||
| Tafasitamab | CD19 | 2a | 26 | 6 | Jurczak et al.70 |
| Tafasitamab plus lenalidomide | CD19 | 2 | 60 | 43 | Salles et al.71 |
| Antibody-drug conjugates | |||||
| Loncastuximab tesirine | CD19 | 1 | 42 | 23 | Hamadani et al.72 |
| Brentuximab vedotin | CD30 | 2 | 44 | 17 | Jacobsen et al.73 |
| Polatuzumab vedotin | CD79b | 1 | 52‡ | 13‡ | Palanca-Wessels et al.74 |
| Polatuzumab vedotin plus BR vs. BR | CD79b | 2, randomized | 45 vs. 17.5 | 40 vs. 17.5 | Sehn et al.75 |
| Bispecific antibodies | |||||
| Blinatumomab | CD19-CD3 | 2 | 43 | 19 | Viardot et al76 |
| Mosunetuzumab | CD20-CD3 | 1/1b | 35§ | 19§ | Schuster et al.77 |
| Glofitamab | CD20-CD3 | 1/1b | 41 | 29 | Hutchings et al.78 |
| Odronextamab | CD20-CD3 | 1 | 42¶ | 35¶ | Bannerji et al.79 |
| Epcoritamab | CD20-CD3 | 1/2 | 76‖ | 32‖ | Hutchings et al.80 |
| NF-κB and BCR modifiers | |||||
| Ibrutinib | BTK | 1/2 | 37 ABC, 5 GCB | 16 ABC, 0 GCB | Wilson et al.81 |
| Lenalidomide vs. investigator’s choice | Multiple, NF-κB | 2, randomized | 28 vs. 12 | 10 vs. 2 | Czuczman et al.82 |
| Agents with other targets | |||||
| Venetoclax | BCL2 | 1 | 18 | 12 | Davids et al.83 |
| Selinexor | XPO1 | 2b | 28 | 12 | Kalakonda et al.84 |
| Checkpoint inhibitors | |||||
| Nivolumab | PD-1 | 2 | ≤10 | ≤3 | Ansell et al.85 |
| Magrolimab | CD47 | 1b | 40 | 33 | Advani et al.86 |
| Epigenetic modifiers | |||||
| Tazemetostat | EZH2 | 2 | 17 EZH2 mt, 17 EZH2 wt | 3 EZH2 mt, 9 EZH2 wt | Ribrag et al.87 |
Results from early clinical trials involving patients with relapsed or refractory DLBCL are shown. BCL2 denotes B-cell lymphoma 2, BCR B-cell receptor, BR bendamustine plus rituximab, BTK Bruton’s tyrosine kinase, EZH2 enhancer of zeste homologue 2, mt mutant, NF-κB nuclear factor κB, PD-1 programmed cell death protein 1, wt wild type, and XPO1 exportin 1.
The three CD19-specific chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell products differ in the nature of the CAR construct and in the manufacturing processes (axicabtagene ciloleucel comprises bulk T cells retrovirally transduced with a receptor containing the CD28 costimulatory domain; tisagenlecleucel comprises bulk T cells lentivirally transduced with a receptor containing the 4−1BB costimulatory molecule; and lisocabtagene maraleucel comprises a 1:1 mix of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells separately transduced with a lentiviral vector coding for a receptor with the 4−1BB costimulatory domain). The bispecific CD3–CD20 antibodies present several differences in the antigen recognition domains of the antibodies and the number of binding sites to CD20, as well as in the route of administration (intravenous vs. subcutaneous). For these bispecific antibodies, early data from dose-escalation studies are presented.
Results pertain to patients receiving a dose of 1.8 mg per square meter of body-surface area or higher.
Results pertain to the aggressive non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma cohort.
Results pertain to patients receiving a dose of 80 mg or higher.
Results pertain to patients receiving a dose of 12 mg or higher.