Skip to main content
Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica logoLink to Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica
. 1977 Sep 1;18(3):349–360. doi: 10.1186/BF03548432

Saponin Adjuvants. IV. Evaluation of The Adjuvant Quil a in the Vaccination of Cattle Against Foot-And-Mouth Disease

K Dalsgaard 1,, Merethe H Jensen 1, K J Sørensen 1
PMCID: PMC8377628  PMID: 910657

Abstract

The saponin adjuvant Quil A has been investigated in the vaccination of cattle against foot-and-mouth disease. Using a Frenkel type vaccine a dose-response relationship has been established between Quil A and neutralizing antibody titres. Ten ml of vaccine was combined with 0, 50, 200, 800, and 3200 µg of Quil A. The combinations were each injected into 4 animals. The local reaction on the site of injection produced by injection of the vaccine alone and in combination with different doses of Quil A has been estimated. On this basis a therapeutical dose at 1 mg of Quil A has been estimated to combine maximum adjuvant effect with a minimum of adverse reactions. This dose has been tested in the vaccination of cattle with FMD vaccines derived from BHK suspension cell virus of type O and A respectively. The vaccines were tested in 10 ml and 5 ml doses with or without Quil A, and each in 4 animals. It is concluded that Quil A is a valuable adjuvant for use in the induction of neutralizing antibodies against foot-and-mouth disease in cattle.

Keywords: adjuvant, FMD, saponin, vaccines, neutralizing antibodies, Quil A.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.1 MB).

References

  1. Anderson E C, Masters R C, Mowat G N. Immune response of pigs to inactivated foot-and-mouth disease vaccines. Res. vet. Sci. 1971;12:351–357. doi: 10.1016/S0034-5288(18)34162-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bayramoglu O, Unluleblebici N, Girard H C. Duree de 1’immunite consecutive a I’utilisation du vaccin antiaphteux prepare avec 10 et 25 milligrammes de saponine par dose. (Duration of the immunity after application of a foot-and-mouth disease vaccine prepared with 10 or 25 mg of saponin per dose). Bull. Acad, vet. Fr. 1968;41:165–168. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Charlier G, Strobbe R, Debecq J, Lennen J. Studies about the adjuvant activity of saponin fractions in foot-and-mouth disease vaccines. Arch. exp. Vet.-Med. 1973;27:783–789. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Croxton F E. Elementary Statistics, with Applications in Medicine and the Biological Sciences. New York: Dover Publications Inc.; 1959. [Google Scholar]
  5. Dalsgaard K. Thin-layer chromatographic fingerprinting of commercially available saponins. Dansk T. Farm. 1970;44:327–331. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Dalsgaard K. Saponin adjuvants. I. The presence of a non-dialysable fraction of Quillaja saponaria Molina with adjuvant activity in foot-and-mouth disease vaccines. Bull. Off. int. Epiz. 1972;77:1289–1295. [Google Scholar]
  7. Dalsgaard K. Saponin adjuvants. II. The influence of dialysis of saponin on the local irritating effect. Bull. Off. int. Epiz. 1972;77:1297–1301. [Google Scholar]
  8. Dalsgaard K. Saponin adjuvants. III. Isolation of a substance from Quillaja saponaria Molina with adjuvant activity in foot-and- mouth disease vaccines. Arch. ges. Virusforsch. 1974;44:243–254. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Espinet R G. Nouveau vaccin antiaphteux a complexe glucoviral. (A new foot-and-mouth disease vaccine with a glycoviral complex). Gac. vet. (B. Aires) 1951;13:268–272. [Google Scholar]
  10. Frenkel H S. Research on foot-and-mouth disease. II. The cultivation of the virus in explantations of tongue epithelium of bovine animals. Amer. J. vet. Res. 1950;11:371–380. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hyslop N St G, Morrow A W. The influence of aluminium hydroxide content, dose volume and the inclusion of saponin on the efficacy of inactivated foot-and-mouth disease vaccines. Res. vet. Sci. 1969;10:109–120. doi: 10.1016/S0034-5288(18)34458-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Karber G. Beitrag zur kollektiven Behandlung pharmakologischer Reihenversuche. (Contribution to the treatment of pharmacological data). Naunyn-Schmiedeberg’s Arch. exp. Path. Phar- mak. 1931;162:480–483. doi: 10.1007/BF01863914. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  13. Mowat G N. A comparison of the adjuvant effect of saponin and oil emulsions in foot-and-mouth disease vaccines for cattle. Bull. Off. int. Epiz. 1974;81:1319–1330. [Google Scholar]
  14. Solyom F, Batisz L. The biological properties of saponin and its value as vaccine adjuvant. Bull. Off. int. Epiz. 1974;81:1067–1074. [Google Scholar]
  15. Wehmeyer P. The influence of saponins on the immunizing property of foot-and-mouth disease vaccines of varying ages. Nord. Vet.- Med. 1969;21:92–96. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES