Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Aug 20.
Published in final edited form as: J Geophys Res Planets. 2020 Mar 10;125(7):e2019JE006190. doi: 10.1029/2019je006190

Table 1.

Expected Characteristics of Megabreccia Deposits From Four Known Megabreccia Formation Mechanisms

Formation mechanism Distribution Texture/lithology Block sizes References
Ballistic ejecta Circumferential to outer and inner crater ring
Extend >2 crater radii
Multitude of textures/lithologies
Potential sorting of textures/lithologies with distance
Potential dependency on distance from crater center Hörz (1982)
Ground-hugging, ejecta-related melt flows Not necessarily circumferential
Should extend beyond the outer ring
Occurs locally
Significant melt component
Flow/dike/pseudotachylite structures
No particular expectations Komatsu et al. (2007) and Osinski et al. (2011)
Crater floor/central peak fracturing and/or melt sheet formation Occurs within inner ring or central peak Uplifted/faulted blocks
Preimpact lithologies
Should be in matrix of melt
Primarily large blocks (100s of meters) Caudill et al. (2012), Schultz (1976), Quantin et al. (2012), and Krüger et al. (2016)
Gravitational flow during crater collapse Circumferential to inner crater rim
Occurs primarily within transient crater and faulted region (likely between outer and inner ring)
Multitude of textures/lithologies
Evidence for ground transport
No spatial sorting, complete heterogeneity
Potential dependency on elevation but not distance Belza et al. (2012), Stöffler et al. (2004), and Trowbridge et al. (2019)