Table 2. Variation of distribution range (%) of Sousa chinensis under future climate scenarios.
| 2050s | 2100s | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RCP26 | RCP45 | RCP60 | RCP85 | RCP26 | RCP45 | RCP60 | RCP85 | |
| PercLoss | 75.626 | 84.197 | 81.133 | 81.493 | 80.566 | 86.451 | 90.72 | 95.815 |
| PercGain | 3.995 | 3.507 | 3.595 | 3.86 | 3.595 | 3.562 | 3.653 | 5.083 |
| PercStable | 24.374 | 15.803 | 18.867 | 18.507 | 19.434 | 13.549 | 9.28 | 4.185 |
| SpeciesRangeChange | −71.631 | −80.69 | −77.538 | −77.633 | −76.971 | −82.889 | −87.067 | −90.732 |
Notes.
- RCP
- representative concentration pathway
- PercLoss
- percentage of loss
- PercGain
- percentage of gain
- PerStable
- percentage of stability
Species range changes were calculated as (suitable range under future climate scenarios—present-day suitable range)/present-day suitable range.