Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Aug 20.
Published in final edited form as: Brain Imaging Behav. 2021 Apr;15(2):614–629. doi: 10.1007/s11682-020-00272-z

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7

(A) Accuracy of connectome fingerprinting using CPC matrices across different paradigm combinations. Note that fingerprinting accuracies for functional connectivity matrices during each of the five paradigms were also included (as number of paradigm = 1) to facilitate direct comparisons with that of the CPC matrices. All derived accuracies were significantly higher than the chance level (~ 0.125), as calculated from 10,000 permutations. (B) Significantly higher accuracies were shown for matrices using Power atlas, only task data, and larger number of paradigms. Error bars indicate standard errors