Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 19;31(9):7132–7142. doi: 10.1007/s00330-021-07809-w

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Boxplots show contrast-to-noise ratios (CNR) for different scenarios: lumen vs. fat to approximate an epicardial vessel surrounded by fat, lumen vs. muscle to approximate a non-calcified plaque, and lumen vs. trabecular bone to approximate a calcified plaque. When comparing group A (5 mL/s) with group B (2.5 mL/s reconstructed at 55 keV), no significant difference in lumen to bone CNR was found, but group B had significantly better lumen to fat and lumen to muscle CNR