Skip to main content
. 2021 Aug 21;803:149834. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149834

Table 1.

A summary of the commonly used methods for viral detection in wastewater.

Method Sensitivity Time required LOD
(SARS-COV2)
Specificity Advantages Disadvantages References
RT-PCR 89-95% 2 h 10 copies/μL 93%
  • Highly sensitive towards specific organisms

  • Requires expensive instruments

  • Requires the knowledge of the detected organisms

  • Requires concentration of samples

  • Highly susceptible to contamination by inhibitors

  • Have low limit of detection

  • Cannot differentiate between dead and alive organisms

  • Interference of humic acids

  • Relatively slow detection time

(Asif et al., 2021; Nassir et al., 2020; Pilevar et al., 2020; Rabiee et al., 2020; Russo et al., 2020)

NASBA Up to 95% 60-90 mins 1 copy/reaction 98.9%
  • Highly sensitive and specificity

  • Simple procedure

  • Relatively fast

  • Sample contamination resistance

  • Expensive kits

  • Few available essays for environmental sampling

  • False positive has higher chances over false negative

(Fakruddin et al., 2012; Lahrich et al., 2021; Matovu et al., 2010; Chantratita et al., 2004)

Biosensors Up to 96.7% 15 mins 0.22 pM Up to 100%
  • Affordable cost

  • High sensitivity

  • Rapid real time detection

  • Simple procedure

  • Portability

  • Requires small samples

  • Antibody binding is influenced by environmental parameters such as pH, temperature, etc.

  • Binding of antibody-antigen can be influenced by reagents, solvents, or radiation

  • Transcription regulation is a complex process

(Choi, 2020; Ejeian et al., 2018; Lahrich et al., 2021; Qiu et al., 2020)

Flow cytometry (FCM) NA 15-45 mins NA NA
  • Rapid detection

  • High throughput

  • High accuracy

  • Ease of use

  • Requires fresh samples

  • Only detect alive cells

(Brown et al., 2015; Brussaard, 2004; Ma et al., 2013)

ELISA 20-80% 2 h 1 ng/mL >98%
  • Affordable costs

  • Relatively simple procedure

  • Low specificity

  • Concentration of sample is required

  • Time consuming

  • Low limit of detection

(Feng et al., 2020; Pilevar et al., 2020; Sakamoto et al., 2018; Saville et al., 2001; Streeck et al., 2020)

PFGE NA 24-26 h NA NA
  • Very sensitive to genetic differences

  • High throughput

  • Too sensitive to differentiate between sources

  • A prior database is required

  • Time consuming

(Meays et al., 2004)