Table 1.
A summary of the commonly used methods for viral detection in wastewater.
Method | Sensitivity | Time required | LOD (SARS-COV2) |
Specificity | Advantages | Disadvantages | References |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RT-PCR | 89-95% | 2 h | 10 copies/μL | 93% |
|
|
(Asif et al., 2021; Nassir et al., 2020; Pilevar et al., 2020; Rabiee et al., 2020; Russo et al., 2020) |
NASBA | Up to 95% | 60-90 mins | 1 copy/reaction | 98.9% |
|
|
(Fakruddin et al., 2012; Lahrich et al., 2021; Matovu et al., 2010; Chantratita et al., 2004) |
Biosensors | Up to 96.7% | 15 mins | 0.22 pM | Up to 100% |
|
|
(Choi, 2020; Ejeian et al., 2018; Lahrich et al., 2021; Qiu et al., 2020) |
Flow cytometry (FCM) | NA | 15-45 mins | NA | NA |
|
|
(Brown et al., 2015; Brussaard, 2004; Ma et al., 2013) |
ELISA | 20-80% | 2 h | 1 ng/mL | >98% |
|
|
(Feng et al., 2020; Pilevar et al., 2020; Sakamoto et al., 2018; Saville et al., 2001; Streeck et al., 2020) |
PFGE | NA | 24-26 h | NA | NA |
|
|
(Meays et al., 2004) |