Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Aug 21.
Published in final edited form as: Ophthalmology. 2018 Sep 29;126(6):856–865. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.09.039

Table 3.

Mann–Whitney Unpaired Tests and Kruskal–Wallis Analysis of Variance for All Nonreticular Pseudodrusen Participants with AREDS Step Grading at Baseline on Standard 5° Testing Protocol (82% Focal Bleach, Test Spot at 5°) Comparing Participants Who Had No Change, Decreased, or Increased AREDS Step at 4 Years

Decrease or No Change in AREDS Step Increase in AREDS Step (1 Step) Increase in AREDS Step (≥2 Steps) Transitioned to SDD

No. 37 15 7 5
Median slope (IQR), min/yr 0.28 (0.07–1.2) 0.69 (0.16–1.8) 0.62 (0.29–1.4) 2.7 (2.2–3.7)
Mean slope (SD), min/yr 0.60 (0.71) 1.0 (1.2) 0.85 (0.55) 2.9 (0.80)
Mann–Whitney P value 0.24 0.17 <0.0001*
<0.0001§
Kruskal–Wallis analysis of variance P value 0.27 0.0027*,

AREDS = Age-Related Eye Disease Study; IQR = interquartile range; RIT = rod intercept time; SD = standard deviation; SDD = subretinal drusenoid deposits.

*

Statistically significant at P value < 0.05.

Slope RIT = linear regression of RIT values (minimum 5 data points).

Compared with control group defined as eyes with a decrease or no change in AREDS step.

§

Eyes that do not transition to SDD (decrease or no change in AREDS step + increase in AREDS step [1 step] + increase in AREDS step [≥2 steps]) compared with eyes with transition to SDD.

Comparing decrease or no change in AREDS step versus increase in AREDS step (1 step) versus increase in AREDS step (≥ 2 steps).

Comparing decrease or no change in AREDS step versus increase in AREDS step (1 step) versus increase in AREDS step (≥ 2 steps) versus transition to SDD.