Table 5.
Concurrent vs. Alcohol Only |
Simultaneous vs. Alcohol Only |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
95% Confidence Limits |
95% Confidence Limits |
|||||
Variable | OR | Lower | Upper | OR | Lower | Upper |
| ||||||
Intercept | 0.24 | 0.14 | 0.40 | 0.78 | 0.52 | 1.17 |
Semester | 1.81 | 1.31 | 2.50 | 1.09 | 0.83 | 1.43 |
Female Sex | 0.71 | 0.49 | 1.02 | 0.41 | 0.28 | 0.60 |
Non-Hispanic White | 0.82 | 0.57 | 1.18 | 0.89 | 0.62 | 1.29 |
Athlete | 0.29 | 0.16 | 0.52 | 0.22 | 0.13 | 0.37 |
Substance-free Dorm | 0.10 | 0.03 | 0.36 | 0.19 | 0.08 | 0.49 |
Greek Intentions (Maybe) | 0.92 | 0.62 | 1.37 | 1.94 | 1.30 | 2.90 |
Greek Intentions (Yes) | 0.70 | 0.30 | 1.60 | 2.66 | 1.31 | 5.43 |
Proportion Drinking Buddies | 2.00 | 1.15 | 3.47 | 16.62 | 9.17 | 30.15 |
Note. 95% confidence limits with bounds outside of 1.00 are reported in bold typeface. The reference value for Semester is “Fall.” The reference value for Greek Intentions is “No.” Participants could not identify cannabis-use buddies if they did not use cannabis themselves. Thus, “Proportion Friend Cannabis Users” would not apply to the “Alcohol Only” category and was only relevant for the Simultaneous vs. Concurrent comparison (see Table 6).
Note: The difference in the n between Tables 4 and 5 reflects missingness on the proportion of drinking buddies variable.