Table 5.
Distribution of the high and low training response scores across seven phenotypes
# of high-response traits | Low response | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | Total | |
# of low-response traits | |||||||||
0 | 2.5 (14) | 8.5 (48) | 8.1 (46) | 3.9 (22) | 2.7 (15) | 0.7 (4) | 0.2 (1) | 0.2 (1) | 26.8 (151) |
1 | 7.1 (40) | 12.1 (68) | 11.2 (63) | 3.7 (21) | 1.4 (8) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 35.5 (200) |
2 | 6.7 (38) | 7.8 (44) | 3.7 (21) | 0.9 (5) | 0.5 (3) | 0.2 (1) | 0 | 0 | 19.8 (112) |
3 | 5.7 (32) | 4.1 (23) | 1.8 (10) | 0.3 (2) | 0.2 (1) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12.1 (68) |
4 | 3.2 (18) | 1.0 (6) | 0.2 (1) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4.4 (25) |
5 | 0.7 (4) | 0.2 (1) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.9 (5) |
6 | 0.3 (2) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.3 (2) |
7 | 0.2 (1) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 (1) |
26.4 (149) | 33.7 (190) | 25.0 (141) | 8.8 (50) | 4.8 (27) | 0.9 (5) | 0.2 (1) | 0.2 (1) | 100 (564) | |
High-response Total |
Frequencies are given as percentage (number of subjects); total n=564.