Skip to main content
. 2021 Aug 22;63(3):425–452. doi: 10.1007/s11162-021-09656-6

Table 5.

Blinder-Oaxaca decomposition of difference in mean retention rate between 2017 & 2004

Mean retention rate
 2017 retention 54.64***
(0.304)
 2004 retention 50.29***
(0.386)
 Difference 4.352***
(0.491)
 Total explained by compositional factors 0.775
(0.611)
Contributions to explained difference
 Student body composition variables
  Percent need-based grant recipients 0.041
(0.336)
  Percent part-time, FTF 0.739***
(0.211)
  Percent female, FTF − 0.057
(0.149)
  Percent Black, FTF 0.0021
(0.051)
  Percent Latinx, FTF 0.235
(0.238)
  Percent Asian, FTF − 0.015
(0.022)
  Percent Native, FTF 0.050
(0.153)
  Percent first-time freshmen (FTF) − 0.012
(0.046)
 Total student body composition 0.983*
(0.490)
 College environment variables
  Enrollment (FTE), logged 0.040
(0.087)
  Tuition − 0.444***
(0.129)
  Percent loan recipients 0.0322
(0.170)
  Student-faculty ratio 0.084
(0.055)
  Adjunct share of instructional staff 0.015
(0.024)
  Instructional spending/FTE, logged 0.549
(0.891)
  Academic support/FTE, logged 0.434
(0.586)
  Student services/FTE, logged − 0.206
(0.872)
  Scholarships/FTE, logged − 0.773**
(0.258)
 Total college environment − 0.268
(0.292)
  County unemployment rate 0.0612
(0.214)
  Observations 833

Source: IPEDS; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001