Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 9;10(9):1304–1319. doi: 10.1002/sctm.19-0419

TABLE 2.

Effect of treatment‐related factors: cell type

Cell type No. of articles WMD/SMD [95% CI] Comparison group P value
Creatinine (mg/dL)
MSC 13 −0.29 [−0.36, −0.22] MSC vs UC/AF .7
UC/AF 4 −0.34 [−0.57, −0.10] MSC vs Non‐MSC <.0001
Non‐MSC 1 −0.10 [−0.13, −0.07] MSC vs Product .7
Cell product 2 −0.41 [−1.03, 0.20] Non‐MSC vs UC/AF .05
Non‐MSC vs Product .3
UC/AF vs Product .8
Non‐MSC vs Product .09
Urea (mg/dL)
MSC 12 −31.66 [−44.46, −18.85] MSC vs UC/AF .06
UC/AF 3 −17.32 [−25.22, −9.42] MSC vs Non‐MSC .08
Non‐MSC 1 −19.25 [−24.33, −14.17] MSC vs Product .3
Cell product 2 −59.22 [−105.86, −12.59] UC/AF vs Non‐MSC .7
UC/AF vs Product .08
Non‐MSC vs Product .09
Urine protein
MSC 20 −2.38 [−2.97, −1.79] MSC vs UC/AF .03
UC/AF 3 −26.43 [−48.19, −4.67] MSC vs Non‐MSC .3
Non‐MSC 2 −43.85 [−116.81, 29.10] MSC vs Product .2
Cell product 4 −3.823 [−5.68, −1.96] UC/AF vs Non‐MSC .7
UC/AF vs Product .04
Non‐MSC vs Product .3
Fibrosis
Pro‐fibrosis
MSC 16 −3.93 [−5.03, −2.83] MSC vs UC/AF .5
UC/AF 2 −2.50 [−6.68, 1.68] MSC vs Non‐MSC .4
Non‐MSC 3 −5.30 [−8.28, −2.32] MSC vs Product .03
Cell product 2 −9.51 [−14.28, −4.73] Non‐MSC vs UC/AF .3
Non‐MSC vs Product .1
UC/AF vs Product .03
Antifibrosis
MSC 3 4.01 [0.87, 7.15] MSC vs UC/AF .1
UC/AF 1 1.33 [0.15, 2.50]
Inflammation
Blood pro‐inflammation
MSC 5 −2.83 [−3.71, −1.95] MSC vs UC/AF .7
UC/AF 1 −3.62 [−7.07, −0.18]
Blood anti‐inflammation
MSC 2 0.99 [0.33, 1.64]
Kidney pro‐inflammation
MSC 9 −3.27 [−4.80, −1.74]
UC/AF MSC vs Non‐MSC .05
Non‐MSC 1 −1.22 [−2.60, 0.16]
Cell product
Kidney anti‐inflammation
MSC 4 3.71 [1.65, 5.76]

Note: Bold values are those that are statistically significant.

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; MSC, mesenchymal stem cells; Non‐MSC, other cells; SMD, standardized mean difference; UC/AF, umbilical cord/amniotic fluid cells; UCB, umbilical cord and amniotic fluid stem cells; WMD, weighted mean difference.