Table 1.
First author (year) | Number of patients | Sensitivity of RT-PCR and CT | Difference of sensitivity | |
---|---|---|---|---|
RT-PCR | CT scans | |||
(Ai et al. 2020) | 1014 | 59% | 88% | 29% |
(Bernheim et al. 2020) | 121 | 74% | 83% | 9% |
(Falaschi et al. 2020) | 773 | 60% | 63% | 3% |
(Fang et al. 2020) | 51 | 71% | 98% | 27% |
(Feng et al. 2020) | 38 | 24% | 97% | 73% |
(Gietema et al. 2020) | 193 | 43% | 57% | 14% |
(He et al. 2020) | 34 | 79% | 77% | 2% |
(Long et al. 2020) | 36 | 83% | 97% | 13% |
(Mei et al. 2020) | 905 | 46% | 75% | 29% |
(Yamamoto et al. 2020) | 36 | 14% | 44% | 30% |
CT computed tomography, RT-PCR real-time quantitative reverse transcriptase PCR