Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Aug 23.
Published in final edited form as: Eat Behav. 2021 May 15;42:101528. doi: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2021.101528

Table 3.

Summary of adjusted linear regressions examining weight and shape concerns by sexual orientation and gender identity in the entire sample.

B SE M 95% CI Significant contrasts

Shape and weight concerns
Sexual orientation (F(6,8013) = 25.19, p < .001)
 Heterosexual (ref)
 Gay or lesbian 1.99 1.58 42.10 − 1.11–5.09
 Bisexual 9.89 0.93 50.0*** 8.05–11.72 B > H, O, G/L
 Other sexual orientation 4.22 0.98 44.30*** 2.30–6.14 O > H
Gender identity (F (5,8014) = 176.8, p < .001)
 Cisgender male (ref)
 Cisgender female 17.81 0.61 46.80*** 16.61–19.01 F > M
 Gender diverse 14.41 1.74 43.40*** 11.00–17.82 GD > M

Note. Tukey-corrected models and means adjusted for age, race, and ethnicity. All contrasts were significant at p < .001. Standard errors are of the adjusted regression coefficients not adjusted means.

Abbreviations: H, heterosexual; G/L, gay/lesbian; B, bisexual; O, other sexual orientation; SE, standard error; CI, confidence interval.