Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 23;78(9):691–696. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2020-107038

Table 3.

Differences in the average reporting quality in articles between journals, year of publication and RoB in studies

Average reporting quality in articles # articles Mean reporting quality
(%) (95% CI)
Mean difference
(95% CI)
P value
Journals with versus without CONSORT requirement
 With CONSORT requirement 71 52.1 (44.4 to 59.8)
 Without CONSORT requirement 64 21.1 (15.1 to 27.1) 31.0 (21.4 to 40.7) <0.001
Older versus newer publications
 Articles published 2010–2014 69 34.6 (26.7 to 42.6)
 Articles published 2015–2019 66 40.3 (32.4 to 48.2) −5.7 (−16.8 to 5.4) 0.309
Articles of low versus some concern vs high risk of bias studies
 Low 52 61.1 (53.2 to 68.9)
 Some concern 66 21.2 (15.2 to 27.3) 39.8 (30.0 to 49.7) <0.001
 High 17 27.9 (12.4 to 43.4) 33.1 (16.1 to 50.2) <0.001
Articles of unclear versus clear risk of bias studies
 Unclear RoB (some concern) 66 21.2 (15.2 to 27.3)
 Clear RoB (low or high) 69 52.9 (45.2 to 60.6) −31.7 (−41.4 to −22.0) <0.001

CONSORT, Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials; RoB, risk of bias.