Skip to main content
. 2021 May 24;28(9):5238–5249. doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2021.05.040

Table 6.

Photosynthesis rate, transpiration rate, photosynthetic water use efficiency and stomatal conductance under various levels of potted soil water holding capacity.

Field Capacity Levels Photosynthesis Rate (μM m−2sec-1)
Transpiration Rate (mM m−2sec-1)
Photosynthetic Water Use Efficiency
Stomatal Conductance (M m−2sec-1)
Chakwal-50 Wafaq-2001 Chakwal-50 Wafaq-2001 Chakwal-50 Wafaq-2001 Chakwal-50 Wafaq-2001
80% 35.7 ± 0.48 a 31 ± 0.48 bc 8.8 ± 0.12 a 7.2 ± 0.12b 4.1 ± 0.11b 4.3 ± 0.14b 0.93 ± 0.03 a 0.82 ± 0.01f
60% 32.8 ± 0.45b 28.8 ± 0.48 cd 8.3 ± 0.09 a 6.9 ± 0.08b 3.9 ± 0.07b 4.2 ± 0.03b 0.82 ± 0.03 ab 0.97 ± 0.01 cd
40% 27.8 ± 0.50 d 24.1 ± 0.42 e 7.5 ± 0.16b 5.8 ± 0.17c 3.7 ± 0.15b 4.2 ± 0.20b 0.68 ± 0.03b 1.03 ± 0.01b
20% 23.8 ± 0.41 e 21.8 ± 0.45 e 5.4 ± 0.18c 4.1 ± 0.17 d 4.5 ± 0.22b 5.4 ± 0.12 a 0.42 ± 0.03c 1.08 ± 0.01 a
LSD Interaction (T × V) : 2.49 Interaction (T × V) : 0.80 Interaction (T × V) : 0.80 Interaction (T × V) : 0.20

The values represent the averages (±SE) of four independent replicates followed by different letters within columns are significantly different at P ≤ 0.05, according to Duncan’s Multiple Range test.