. 2021 May 24;28(9):5238–5249. doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2021.05.040

Table 7.

Leaf osmotic potential, leaf water potential, leaf cuticular wax and relative water content under various levels of potted soil water holding capacity.

Field Capacity Levels	Leaf Osmotic Potential (-MPa)		Leaf Water Potential (-MPa)		Cuticular Wax Content (μg m⁻²)		Relative Water Content (%)
Field Capacity Levels	Chakwal-50	Wafaq-2001	Chakwal-50	Wafaq-2001	Chakwal-50	Wafaq-2001	Chakwal-50	Wafaq-2001
80%	0.82 ± 0.01^f	0.80 ± 0.03^f	0.30 ± 0.03 ^g	0.29 ± 0.03 ^g	149 ± 5.29 ^e	97.7 ± 8.04^f	87.7 ± 1.71 ^a	81.7 ± 1.68^b
60%	0.97 ± 0.01 ^cd	0.89 ± 0.03 ^e	0.61 ± 0.02^f	0.82 ± 0.02 ^e	234 ± 7.86^c	145.7 ± 5.00 ^e	81 ± 0.33^b	71 ± 0.33 ^cd
40%	1.02 ± 0.01^b	0.94 ± 0.03 ^de	0.93 ± 0.02 ^d	1.31 ± 0.01^b	326 ± 9.29^b	200.3 ± 5.00 ^d	74 ± 0.33^c	62 ± 0.33 ^e
20%	1.08 ± 0.01 ^a	1 ± 0.03 ^bc	1.15 ± 0.02^c	1.51 ± 0.02 ^a	400.7 ± 5.50 ^a	298.3 ± 6.08^b	69 ± 0.33 ^d	56 ± 0.33^f
LSD	Interaction (T × V) : 0.05		Interaction (T × V) : 0.07		Interaction (T × V) : 33.01		Interaction (T × V) : 4.56

The values represent the averages (±SE) of four independent replicates followed by different letters within columns are significantly different at P ≤ 0.05, according to Duncan’s Multiple Range test.