Livestock (available studies) | Animal | Dose (mg/kg bw/d) | Duration (days) | Comment/Source |
---|---|---|---|---|
Thiophanate‐methyl | ||||
Laying hen | 2.9–3.5 | 10 | 14C‐phenyl ring label, Hens (EFSA, 2014, 2018a) | |
Lactating ruminants | 1.15–1.19 | 5 | 14C‐phenyl ring, Goat (EFSA, 2014, 2018a) | |
Pig | – | – | Not available and not required since the metabolism in ruminants and rat is similar (EFSA, 2014) | |
Carbendazim | ||||
Laying hen | 0.37 8.8a | 6 | [2‐14C]‐carbendazim, Hens (EFSA, 2010, 2014) | |
Lactating ruminants | 2.1(b) 1.8c | 5 30 | [2‐14C]‐carbendazim, Cow (EFSA 2010, 2014) 14C‐phenyl, Goat (EFSA 2010, 2014) | |
Pig | – | – | Not available and not required since the metabolism in ruminants and rat is similar (EFSA, 2014) |
In the study summary, the administrated dose was only expressed in mg/kg feed as received (5 and 120 mg/kg feed as received). Based on this information, EFSA derived theoretical administrated doses, assuming a body weight of 1.9 kg, a daily intake of 0.12 kg of feed (dry matter basis) and feed composed of maize grain and pulses.
In the study summary, the administrated dose was only expressed in mg/kg feed as received (50 mg/kg feed as received). Based on this information, EFSA derived a theoretical administrated dose, assuming a body weight of 550 kg, a daily intake of 20 kg of feed (dry matter basis) and feed only composed of hay.
In the study summary, the administrated dose was only expressed in mg/animal per day (73 mg/animal per day). Based on this information, EFSA derived a theoretical administrated dose, assuming a body weight of 40 kg.