Skip to main content
. 2021 Aug 23;40(1):283–289. doi: 10.1007/s00345-021-03809-z

Table 1.

Comparative analysis of alternative high-tech precision robotic systems [57]

Name Features Use Approval Advantages Disadvantages
Open console robotic systems
 Senhance system (Transenterix, Morrisville, NC, USA)

A 3D vision with glasses

An infrared eye-tracking feature to control camera movement

Up to 4 robotic arms on independent carts

Feature of haptic feedback

5 and 3 mm mini-laparoscopic instruments

Abd. surgery, gynecology, urology FDA and CE approval in 2017

Haptic feedback

3 mm mini-laparoscopic instruments

Independent carts

Easier intraoperative communication

No need for system-specific trocars

Camera control with head movements (limits the surgeons comfort)

3D vision with glasses

Handles similar to laparoscopic instruments

4 df range of movements similar to laparoscopy

 Versius (CMR Surgical, Cambridge, GB)

A 3D vision with glasses

Up to 5 robotic arms on independent carts

7 df range of movements

5 mini-laparoscopic instruments

Abd. surgery, gynecology, urology, thoracic surgery, ENT Only CE approval in 2019

Independent carts

Up to 5 arms

Easier intraoperative communication

No need for system-specific trocars

Camera control with head movements (limits the surgeons comfort)

3D vision with glasses

Instruments handling is ergonomic compared to “clutch” function

 Hugo RAS (Medtronic, Dublin, Ireland)

A 3D vision with glasses

Up to 4 robotic arms on independent carts

7 df range of movements

5 mini-laparoscopic instruments

Not applicable CE approval projected in 2021

Independent carts

Easier intraoperative communication

Camera control with head movements (limits the surgeons comfort)

3D vision with glasses

Instruments handling is ergonomic compared to “clutch” function

 MiroSurge (German AeroSpace Center (DLR), Institute of robotics and mechatronics, Wessling, Germany)

Feature of haptic feedback

A 3D vision with glasses

3 robotic arms on independent carts

7 df range of movements

5 mini-laparoscopic instruments

Not applicable Not applicable

Independent carts

Easier intraoperative communication

Haptic feedback

Instrument collision detection feature

Camera control with head movements (limits the surgeons comfort)

3D vision with glasses

Instruments handling is ergonomic compared to “clutch” function

 Flex surgical system (Medrobotics, Raynham, USA)

Flexible design of camera system operated with a simplified joystick

Accompanied by 3 mm flexible instruments with articulating wrists

Colorectal, ENT FDA and CE approval in 2019

Flexible camera

Flexible 3 mm instruments

Designed for ENT and colorectal surgeries
Close console robotic systems
 Revo-I (Meere Company, Hwasong, Korea)

Closed-console control unit

3D HD vision

Robotic cart with 4 robotic arms

7 df range of movements

5 mm instruments

Clutch function

Training module

Abd. surgery, gynecology, urology Korean FDA approval

Closed-console control unit

“Clutch” function

Training module

Obscured intraoperative communication

Instrument clashing

 Avatera (Avateramedical, Jena, Germany)

Closed-console control unit

3D HD vision

Slender eyepiece design (surgeon’s mouth and ears remain uncovered)

Robotic cart with 4 robotic arms

7 df range of movements

5 mm single-use instruments

Use of only bipolar energy

“Clutch” function

Abd. surgery, gynecology, urology CE approval projected in 2021

Closed-console control unit

Slender eyepiece design (surgeon’s mouth and ears remain uncovered)

Single-use instruments

Use of only bipolar energy

Clutch function

Instrument clashing