Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 21;17(9):2999–3015. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2021.1911217

Table 3.

The overall frequency and proportion of participants’ responses to questions about the ethical and policy implications of vaccinomics

  Weighted %
  Strongly Disagree Disagree Agree Strongly Agree Strongly Agree or Agree
Vaccinomics (based on genes/DNA) would help me make informed decisions about vaccines FOR MYSELF. 2.5 6.1 51.5 39.9 91.4
Asked of parents only:
Vaccinomics (based on genes/DNA) would help me make informed decisions about vaccines FOR MY CHILD.a
2.7 4.6 51.1 41.6 92.7
I am afraid that my gene or DNA test result could prevent me from getting a vaccine.b 27.4 50.6 15.6 6.4 22.0
I am afraid that using genes or DNA in vaccine decisions could increase race/ethnic discrimination.b 26.6 44.4 20.3 8.7 29.0
I would have my genes or DNA tested if it would help my doctor or another healthcare provider know which vaccines are best for ME.b 6.7 16.5 42.5 34.3 76.8
I am concerned my HEALTH INSURANCE COMPANY would learn my gene or DNA test result.b 15.6 38.8 30.1 15.5 45.5
I am concerned the U.S. GOVERNMENT would learn my gene or DNA test result.b 15.0 38.0 32.6 14.5 47.0
I would be concerned about the security of my gene or DNA test resultb 13.0 30.7 37.4 18.9 56.3
I would support vaccinomics even if it made vaccine schedules more complex.b 6.2 22.5 52.4 18.8 71.2
Vaccinomics would make me have more confidence in vaccines than I do now.b 7.6 21.7 50.4 20.3 70.7
Vaccinomics is likely to help other people.b 5.1 12.2 52.1 30.5 82.6
Vaccinomics is likely to help me.b 6.2 18.0 50.4 25.4 75.8

aAsked of unweighted n = 1,239 parents of children<18 only.

bThese items had a positively and negatively worded version. The scale of the negatively worded items was reversed and combined with its positively phrased counterpart for analysis. Taylor-linearized variance estimation for survey data used for all data. Unweighted N = 1,925; Weighted N = 1,927.87.