Skip to main content
. 2021 Aug 9;12:683385. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.683385

Table 4.

Results of the meta-analysis.

Study Weights PDQ-39
QoL
Pedreira et al. (29) 0.18% 1.20 [1.682, −7.34]
Liao et al. (31) 0.07% (0.242)
Fontoura et al. (33) 0.11% p < 0.001
Allen et al. (35) 0.33%
Santos et al. (37) 0.03%
Yang et al. (40) 0.11%
Tollar et al. (41) 99.14%
Study Weights ABC
ADL
Gandolfi et al. (32) 61.58% 7.02 [0.364, 13.68]
(3.39)
p = 0.039
Shen and Mak (38) 38.41%
UPDRS II
Pompeu et al. (28) 32.51% −2.37 [−5.97, 1.225]
Fontoura et al. (33) 31.45% (1.83)
Tollar et al. (41) 36.03% p = 1.96
Study Weights BBS
Function
Pompeu et al. (28) 19.06% 2.63 [0.446, 4.83]
Pazzaglia et al. (30) 10.08% (1.11)
Feng et al. (34) 14.08% p = 0.018
Santos et al. (37) 13.47%
Shih et al. (39) 18.17%
Yang et al. (40) 9.50%
Tollar et al. (41) 15.60%
TUG
Liao et al. (31) 15.21% −0.97 [−2.212, 0.258]
Feng et al. (34) 8.11% (0.63)
Pavez-adasme et al. (36) 33.99% p = 0.121
Santos et al. (37) 24.19%
Shih et al. (39) 16.90%
Yang et al. (40) 1.56%
DGI
Pazzaglia et al. (30) 8.58% 1.13 [0.351, 1.924]
Santos et al. (37) 9.66% (0.40)
Tollar et al. (41) 81.75% p = 0.005

QoL, quality of life; ADL, activities of daily living; PDQ-39, Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale-39; ABC, Activities-Specific Balance Confidence Scale; UPDRS II, Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Part II; BBS, Berg Balance Scale; TUG, Timed Up and Go; DGI, Dynamic Gait Index.

Data are presented as standardized mean difference [95% CI], (standard error), p-value.