Table 4.
Comparison of our method with other methods in the MICCAI WMH segmentation challenge. Bold fonts indicate the best result among all teams.
| Team | Rank | DSC | H95 (mm) | AVD (%) | Recall | F1 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||||
| 1 | pgs (ours) | 0.0185 | 0.81 | 5.63 | 18.58 | 0.82 | 0.79 |
| 2 | sysu_media_2 | 0.0187 | 0.80 | 5.76 | 28.73 | 0.87 | 0.76 |
| 3 | sysu_media | 0.0288 | 0.80 | 6.30 | 21.88 | 0.84 | 0.76 |
| 4 | anonymous_20200413 | 0.0314 | 0.79 | 6.17 | 22.99 | 0.83 | 0.77 |
| 5 | coroflo | 0.0493 | 0.79 | 5.46 | 22.53 | 0.76 | 0.77 |
Abbreviations – DSC: the Dice Similarity Coefficient; H95: a modified Hausdorff distance (95th percentile); AVD: the absolute percentage volume difference; Recall: the sensitivity for detecting individual lesions; F1: F1-score for individual lesions.