Skip to main content
. 2021 Aug 12;21(13):1–214.

Table A21:

GRADE Evidence Profile for Comparison of Unspecified Pharmacogenomic-Guided Treatment Selection and Treatment as Usual—Remission

No. of Studies (Design) Risk of Bias Inconsistency Indirectness Imprecision Publication Bias Upgrade Considerations Quality
Response Based on Hamilton Depression Rating Scale
1 (RCT) Very serious limitations (−;2)a No serious limitations No serious limitations Serious limitations (−;1)b Undetected None ⊕ Very Low

Abbreviations: GRADE, Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation; RCT, randomized controlled trial.

a

See Risk of Bias Table A5.

b

Effect estimate spans both large benefit and small harm. Sample size was small and unlikely to meet optimal information size.