Skip to main content
. 2021 Aug 10;9:697651. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2021.697651

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

Proximal-distal kinematics of the residual femur relative to the prosthetic sockets. (A) Individual kinematic proximal-distal plots of the femur for each participant relative to the corresponding socket type. Dashed lines represent relative femur movement in the traditional IC socket. Solid lines represent relative femur movement in the CRS socket. Participant 5 (Green line) used pin locking suspension. All other participants used suction suspension. (B) Mean and standard deviation of the proximal-distal kinematics of the residual femur relative to the traditional IC socket (dashed line) and CRS socket (solid line). The traditional socket had significantly less proximal-distal translation compared to the CRS socket.