TABLE 2.
Femoral Rotations and Translations by Socket Type and Survey Scores.
| CRS | Traditional | 95% CI of difference in means | p-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flexion (+)/Extension (−) (degrees) | 16.0 (9.7) | 15.4 (6.4) | −11.4 to 12.6 | 0.89 |
| Adduction (+)/Abduction (−) (degrees) | 13.0 (5.6) | 10.8 (5.3) | −5.9 to 10.1 | 0.08 |
| Internal (+)/External (−) Rotation (degrees) | 16.6 (7.1) | 14.8 (9.9) | −10.8 to 14.4 | 0.35 |
| Anterior (+)/Posterior (−) translation (cm) | 2.1 (0.6) | 2.4 (0.8) | −0.7 to 1.4 | 0.23 |
| Lateral (+)/Medial (−) translation (cm) | 3.7 (1.3) | 4.6 (2.2) | −1.7 to 3.5 | 0.14 |
| Proximal (+)/Distal (−) translation (cm) | 2.0 (0.6)a | 1.6 (0.7) | −0.4 to 1.4 | 0.04 |
| Subjective survey scores by socket type | ||||
| Tapes-R functional satisfaction | 10.8 (2.6) | 8.2 (1.5) | 0.63 | |
| PPA enabling factors | 53.8 (3.0) | 54.4 (2.3) | 0.63 | |
| PEQ utility subscale | 73.1 (23.1) | 58.0 (11.6) | 0.50 |
Note: Data are mean (SD). CRS, Compression/Release Stabilization; CI, Confidence Interval; PPA, Prosthetic Profile of the Amputee; PEQ, Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire.
a
Significantly different than the Traditional Socket.