Skip to main content
. 2021 Aug 3;10(3):159–165. doi: 10.4103/GMIT.GMIT_95_20

Table 5.

Systematic review of previous studies

Type of study Number of patients/number of Fallopian tubes studied Method used at hysteroscopy Sensitivity, n (%) Specificity, n (%) Limitations of study
Habibaj et al., 2012[24] Prospective 56 patients Diagnostic hysteroscopy followed by transvaginal ultrasound to see fluid in pouch of doughlas 94.7 94.4 Lack of anatomical specificity, generally it is not possible to determine whether unilateral tubal obstruction is present
Torok and Major, 2012[27] Prospective 35 women/70 fallopian tubes Selective pertubation with office hysteroscopy with methylene blue dye 87.5 100
Parry et al., 2017[25] Prospective 435 patients, 89 had abdominal surgery as well Through air infusion into saline during flexible office hysteroscopy (parryscope technique) 98.3-100 83.7
Carta et al., 2018[28] Prospective 47 women/92 fallopian tubes Office hysteroscopy-guided selective chromopertubation 85.7 87.8 19 patients out of 47 did not undergo confirmatory laparoscopy
Promberger et al., 2018[29] Retrospective 511 women/998 fallopian tubes Visualizable flow effect in Fallopian tube ostia on hysteroscopy 86.4 77.6 Cold saline may induce tubal spasmIncomplete description of tubal ostia in 49% cases leading to high dropout rateSurgeon bias-many of cases done for tubal pathologies and hysteroscopy results were interpreted after laparoscopy
Yucel et al., 2018[31] Prospective 64 women/128 fallopian tubes Hysteroscopic chromopertubation with methylene blue dye 85.85 59.09 Failure to observe flow of methylene blue in the distal segment of tube over the adjacent ovarySmall number of patients
Ott et al., 2020[30] Prospective 72 women/144 fallopian tubes Visualizable flow at hysteroscopy 85.3 66.1 Comparing flow effect’s accuracy between proximal and distal tubal occlusions would lead to overinterpretation of results, due to low number of distal occlusions. Distension pressure was not measured during hysteroscopy, may affect predictive value of hazy hysteroscopic picture and other findings, nor chromopertubation pressure standardized