Table 3.
This table shows the data for the mean gains in participants' scores between the pre-questionnaire and team response (team questionnaire).
Team learning gains for chest pain scenario | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Category | W | p | Effect size | Condition | Mean | SD |
Assessment | 0.5 | <0.001 | −0.99 | INT | 5.83 | 1.17 |
VID | 1.00 | 1.95 | ||||
Intervention medication | 16 | 0.059 | −0.56 | INT | 3.33 | 0.52 |
VID | 1.75 | 1.82 | ||||
Evaluation | 15 | 0.039 | −0.58 | INT | 2.33 | 0.52 |
VID | 1.25 | 1.14 | ||||
Intervention communication | 67 | 0.001 | 0.86 | INT | −0.17 | 0.41 |
VID | 0.83 | 0.39 | ||||
Safety | 38 | 0.87 | 0.056 | INT | 0.17 | 0.41 |
VID | 0.33 | 0.99 | ||||
Team learning gains for stroke scenario | ||||||
Category | W | p | Effect size | Condition | Mean | SD |
Assessment | 24.5 | 0.58 | −0.18 | INT | 0.50 | 0.84 |
VID | 0.20 | 2.20 | ||||
Intervention medication | 12.5 | 0.039 | −0.58 | INT | 1.00 | 0.63 |
VID | 0.30 | 0.48 | ||||
Evaluation | – | – | – | INT | 0.33 | 0.52 |
VID | 0.00 | 0.00 | ||||
Intervention communication | 28.00 | 0.87 | -0.067 | INT | −0.17 | 1.17 |
VID | -0.30 | 1.16 | ||||
Safety | 20.5 | 0.32 | −0.32 | INT | 1.00 | 1.27 |
VID | 0.00 | 2.06 |
The statistical test for Evaluation in the stroke scenario could not be conducted because the variance of the means was equal to zero. This data is represented as graphs in Figure 2.