Skip to main content
. 2016 May 25;533(7604):527–531. doi: 10.1038/nature18271

Figure 3. Comparison of the growth rates in two experiments with a dynamic volatility basis set (VBS) model.

Figure 3

a, b, Temporal evolution of the particle size (filled circles) and the modelled particle size (dashed lines) for an experiment with increasing HOM concentration (a), and for constant HOM concentration (b), with the inset magnifying the time evolution of the first 5 nm. c, d, Size-dependent modelled (lines) and measured (filled circles) growth rate for the increasing HOM concentration (c), and for the constant HOM concentration (d). Colours (key in c) indicate the contribution of different volatility bins to the condensational growth. Error bars indicate the error of the fit alone, whiskers the 1σ systematic scale uncertainty of the determined growth rates.

PowerPoint slide

Source data