Skip to main content
. 2021 Aug 16;7:e678. doi: 10.7717/peerj-cs.678

Table 7. The comparison between our proposed scheme and existing studies.

Schemes/systems Number of factors Security Accuracy Actions required Speed
Mobile voting framework (Abayomi-Zannu, Odun-Ayo & Barka, 2019) 2 (s1,s2) Medium Medium At least 2 N/A
Multi-factor authentication protocol based on fuzzy extractor (Mohammed & Yassin, 2019) 2 (s1,s3) Medium High 2 N/A
Multi-factor authentication with single sign-on (Sciarretta et al., 2018) 2 (s1,s2) Medium Medium 2 N/A
Multi-factor authentication using mobile app and camera (Jindal & Misra, 2021) 2 (s2,s3) Medium Medium to high 2 N/A
Multi-factor authentication with location security (Ramatsakane & Leung, 2017) 3 (s1,s2,s4) Medium Medium to high At least 2 Minimum of 5 s
Multi-factor authentication for net banking (Shaji & Soman, 2017) 2 (s1,s2 or s2,s3) Medium Medium to high 2 N/A
Three-factor authentication concept (Bissada & Olmsted, 2017) 3 (s1,s2,s3) High High 2 or 3 (not stated) N/A
Three-factor authentication in ATM (Abiew, Jnr & Banning, 2020) 3 (s1,s2,s3) High High 3 N/A
Three-factor authentication in e-health (Alghamdi, 2021) 3 (s1,s2,s3) High High 3 N/A
Employee attendance system (Kurniawan & Zaky, 2020) 2 (s2,s3) Medium High 2 N/A
Participant time attendance system (Pichetjamroen et al., 2021) 2 (s2,s3) Medium High 2 N/A
Four-factor student attendance system (Yazid et al., 2019) 2 (s3,s4 based on the classical factors in this paper) High (due to onsite verification by human) High 4 N/A
Multi-modal attendance tracking system (Liu et al., 2020) 1 (s4, based on the classical factors in this paper) N/A High (for location) N/A N/A
Comprehensive-factor time attendance system (the proposed scheme) 4 (s1,s2,s3,s4) High High 1 (or zero) Less than 2 s