Skip to main content
. 2021 Aug 16;2021:5510093. doi: 10.1155/2021/5510093

Table 2.

Association between different Mini-Cog versions and with DSRS.

Variables Literate participants (n = 21) Nonliterate participants (n = 42) Total participants (n = 63)
MMC with MPT MMC with SST MC With no neurological diagnosis (n = 27) With neurological diagnosis (n = 15) MMC with MPT MMC with SST
MMC with MPT MMC with SST MMC with MPT MMC with SST
MC χ 2 48.4 42.0
p value 0.003 0.003
Phi/Cramer's V 0.7 0.7
MMC with SST χ 2 42.4 31.1 10.3 63.8
p value 0.002 0.03 0.01 <0.001
Phi/Cramer's V 0.7 0.6 0.8 1.0
DSRS χ 2 73.1 69.1 81.5 66.1 90.2 44.7 32.9 139.8 149.5
p value 0.01 0.003 0.003 0.04 0.007 0.02 0.04 0.002 <0.001
Phi/Cramer's V 0.8 0.9 0.9 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.7 0.7

p < 0.05. χ2: chi-square; MC: Mini-Cog; MMC: modified Mini-Cog; SST: serial subtraction task; MPT: multistep performance task; CDT: clock drawing test; DSRS: Dementia Severity Rating Scale. All distractors were scored either 2 (correct) or 0 (incorrect). The CDT scoring in MC followed the rules empirically developed for the standardized version of the Mini-Cog (http://mini-cog.com).