Skip to main content
. 2021 Aug 16;2021:5591932. doi: 10.1155/2021/5591932

Table 4.

The frequency and percentage of structural biosecurity indicators.

Biosecurity indicators Yes (%) No (%)
Presence of fence and gate 30 (68.18) 14 (31.82)
Presence of functional footbath 40 (90.91) 4 (9.09)
Prohibition of vehicle entry 17 (38.64) 27 (61.36)
Farm vehicle parked off the farm 10 (22.73) 34 (77.27)
Presence of only one vehicle entry point 26 (59.09) 18 (40.91)
Presence of tire bath/spray at the gate 4 (9.09) 40 (90.91)
Prohibition of entry of visitors 31 (70.45) 13 (29.55)
Visitors sign on logbook 1 (2.27) 43 (97.73)
No purchase of day-old chicken 2 (4.55) 42 (95.45)
No purchase of feed 2 (4.55) 42 (95.45)
No equipment exchange with other farms 39 (88.64) 5 (11.36)
No sharing of truck with other farms 4 (9.09) 40 (90.91)
No pet animal present in the farm 24 (54.55) 20 (45.45)
Presence of permanent rodent control 6 (13.64) 38 (86.36)
Presence of permanent wild bird control 3 (6.82) 41 (93.18)
Chicken area not accessible to wild bird 18 (40.91) 26 (59.09)
No access to stored fresh litter for wild birds 26 (59.09) 18 (40.91)
No access to stored food for wild bird 25 (56.82) 19 (43.18)
No feeding of chicken outside and no access to feed for wild birds 37 (84.09) 7 (15.91
Stay informed regarding the outbreak of poultry disease in the area 24 (54.55) 20 (45.45)
Surface water not used for drinking of chicken 44 (100) 0 (0.00)
Surface water not used for cleaning 44 (100) 0 (0.00)