Table 3.
Result
|
Ref.
|
Mean lengthening (cm)
|
Accuracy
|
Reliability
|
Distraction rate (mm/d)
|
Day to full weight bearing
|
Consolidation index (d/cm)
|
ASAMI functional score
|
ASAMI bone score
|
| Hammouda et al[32] | 5.6 (3-6.7) | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Szymczuk et al[30] | 4.75 ± 1.43 | 95% | - | 0.7 ± 0.18 | - | 34.7 ± 11.2 | - | - |
| Iliadis et al[29] | - | 96% | 98% | 0.92 (0.67-1) | 45 (21-132) | 28 (18-43) | 35 excellent; 11 good; 3 fairs; 1 poor | 41 excellent; 8 good; 1 fair |
| Nasto et al[27] | 4.4 ± 1.2 | 91% | 88% | 0.9 ± 0.1 | - | 11.9 ± 2.1 | 22 excellent; 3 good; 1 fair | 24 excellent; 1 fair; 1 poor |
| Tomaszewski et al[28] | 4.9 (4-5.8) | - | - | 0.8 (0.8-1) | - | 29.3 (21-33) | - | - |
In brackets measurement unit; Data are reported as absolute values.